Related Experiment Videos
The relationship between employee attitudes and conflicting expectations for lying behavior
1Department of Business and Administrative Studies Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA. sims@nova.edu
The Journal of Psychology
|November 25, 2000
Summary
Conflicting ethical expectations regarding lying behavior negatively impact employee job satisfaction and commitment. Increased discrepancies lead to higher turnover intentions and role conflict, but not job continuation commitment.
Area of Science:
- Business Ethics
- Organizational Behavior
- Psychology
Background:
- Ethical expectations in the workplace are crucial for employee attitudes and behaviors.
- Discrepancies between formal ethical codes and supervisor expectations can create workplace conflict.
- Understanding the impact of these conflicts on employees is vital for organizational health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between conflicting ethical expectations for lying behavior and various employee attitudes.
- To determine how differences between formal ethics codes and supervisor expectations influence employee outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Survey research was conducted with a sample of 140 full-time employees.
- Data were collected on perceptions of ethical codes, supervisor expectations, and employee attitudes.
- Statistical analyses were used to examine the associations between variables.
Main Results:
- A greater difference between formal ethics codes and supervisor expectations for lying behavior was associated with increased employee turnover intentions.
- Increased discrepancies also correlated with higher levels of intrapersonal role conflict among employees.
- Conversely, these conflicts were linked to decreased job satisfaction, organizational satisfaction, and affective commitment.
Conclusions:
- Conflicting ethical expectations regarding lying behavior significantly impact employee attitudes, leading to negative outcomes.
- Organizations must align formal ethical guidelines with supervisory practices to foster a more positive work environment.
- While commitment to continue in the job was not affected, other key indicators of employee well-being and engagement were negatively influenced.