Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An outbreak of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a neonatal intensive care unit: use of a case-control study to investigate and control it and lessons learnt.

The Journal of hospital infection·2019
Same author

Potential for hypoxic gas mixture delivery using a Flexima 2 anaesthetic machine.

Anaesthesia·2016
Same author

Virus shedding and environmental deposition of novel A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus: interim findings.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2010
Same author

Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection: difficulties in diagnosis and treatment.

Anaesthesia·2009
Same author

B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia have distinctive gene expression signatures.

Leukemia·2009
Same author

Molecular profiling pleomorphic lobular carcinomas of the breast: evidence for a common molecular genetic pathway with classic lobular carcinomas.

The Journal of pathology·2008
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study.

J Greatorex1, T Dexter

  • 1University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, England. greatorex@ucles.org.uk

Journal of Advanced Nursing
|November 30, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a graphical method to analyze consensus stability and agreement convergence in Delphi studies. It helps researchers understand how expert opinions evolve across questionnaire rounds, particularly in healthcare.

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare research methodology
  • Expert consensus building

Background:

  • The Delphi method is widely used for expert consensus in healthcare.
  • Many Delphi studies lack analysis of consensus stability and agreement convergence across rounds.
  • Understanding these dynamics is crucial for robust Delphi study outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an accessible analytical approach for evaluating consensus stability and agreement convergence in Delphi studies.
  • To illustrate the methodology using a healthcare-based Delphi study example.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines a graphical analysis technique using means and standard deviations.
  • This method is applicable to Delphi studies employing interval scales for expert opinions.
  • Visualizing means and standard deviations across rounds identifies changes in group opinion and agreement levels.

Main Results:

  • The proposed graphical method provides clear insights into the evolution of consensus between Delphi rounds.
  • Analysis of means indicates shifts in group opinion.
  • Analysis of standard deviations reveals changes in the level of agreement among experts.

Conclusions:

  • The presented analytical approach enhances the rigor of Delphi studies by enabling the assessment of consensus dynamics.
  • This methodology offers a practical tool for researchers to interpret changes in expert agreement over time.
  • Improved reporting of consensus stability and convergence can strengthen the validity of Delphi study findings in healthcare.