Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Saccadic latency during perceptual processing and sequence learning.

J G May1, M L Berg, L A Zebley

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, LA 70148, USA. jgmps@uno.edu

Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|November 30, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of Chlamydia gallinacea in a parrot and in free-range chickens in Australia.

Australian veterinary journal·2019
Same author

Evaluation of the use of buprenorphine for opioid withdrawal in an emergency department.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2006
Same author

Stationary phantoms and grating induction with oblique inducing gratings: implications for different mechanisms underlying the two phenomena.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Relationship of temperament and perceptions of nonshared environment in bulimia nervosa.

The International journal of eating disorders·2000
Same author

Afterimages, grating induction and illusory phantoms.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Change in the mode of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by (4-nitrophenyl)sulfonoxyl derivatives of conformationally constrained choline analogues.

Chemical research in toxicology·1998
Same journal

Early onset primary angle closure and foveal retinoschisis associated with a pseudo-homozygous CRB1 pathogenic variant.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Bilateral perifoveal macular ischemia in non-proliferative Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated retinopathy: a case report.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Association between dynamic pupil parameters and corneal sub-basal nerve plexus morphology.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Structure-function relationship between handheld photopic negative response and macular GCIPL thickness in chronic optic neuropathy.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Clinical course of a patient with PRSS56-associated nanophthalmos (isolated microphthalmia) and uveal effusion syndrome.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Congenital grouped albinotic spots of the retinal pigment epithelium-a case report.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Saccadic reaction times (SR) suggest eye movements are automated. Local stimulus processing was slower than global, but showed robust sequence learning, unlike choice conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Manual reaction time (RT) differences distinguish cognitive operations.
  • Simple and choice saccadic latencies (SL) are similar, implying automated eye movements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate saccadic reaction times (SR) for same/different locations and compound stimuli.
  • Assess sequence learning in visual perception and saccade generation.

Main Methods:

  • Measured SL and SR for targets using global or local cues.
  • Administered behavioral and post-test sequence learning assessments.

Main Results:

  • Local response times were slower than choice or global.
  • Observed global precedence and consistency effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Found robust sequence learning in the local condition, but correct recall only in choice.

    • Conclusions:

    • Saccade generation may involve parallel processing models.
    • Local processing is slower but supports sequence learning.
    • Choice conditions are crucial for sequence recall.