Complications of repair of the distal biceps tendon with the modified two-incision technique

E W Kelly1, B F Morrey, S W O'Driscoll

  • 1Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Abstract

Insights

This study reviewed distal biceps tendon repairs using a muscle-splitting technique, finding most complications linked to delayed surgery. The two-incision method showed rare radioulnar synostosis, suggesting safety for surgeons at all experience levels.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Sports Medicine
  • Musculoskeletal Research

Background:

  • Distal biceps tendon avulsions require surgical repair.
  • The muscle-splitting two-incision technique is one method used for repair.
  • Understanding complications associated with this technique is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe complications encountered after using a muscle-splitting two-incision technique for distal biceps tendon repair.
  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of this surgical approach.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 78 consecutive anatomical distal biceps tendon repairs.
  • Repairs performed between 1981 and 1998 using a muscle-splitting two-incision technique (modified Boyd-Anderson approach).
  • Analysis of 74 primary repairs, with four requiring grafts.

Main Results:

  • Complications occurred in 31% (23/74) of repairs.
  • Common complications included nerve paresthesias (6.8%), anterior elbow pain (8.1%), and heterotopic ossification (5.4%).
  • Delayed repairs (more than 21 days) showed higher complication rates (41%) compared to acute repairs (24%).

Conclusions:

  • Delayed timing of distal biceps tendon repair is the primary cause of morbidity.
  • The muscle-splitting two-incision technique is associated with a low rate of radioulnar synostosis.
  • This technique can be safely performed by surgeons with varying levels of experience.