In vitro development of resistance to ceftriaxone, cefprozil and azithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae
K Nagai1, T A Davies, B E Dewasse
1Department of Pathology (Clinical Microbiology), Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 170331, USA.
Abstract:
Approval of ceftriaxone for the treatment of otitis media has led to fear of selection of resistant mutants owing to widespread use. To test this, we examined the ability of sequential subcultures in sub-MICs of ceftriaxone, cefprozil and azithromycin to select resistant mutants in 12 pneumococci. Daily subculturing was performed 50 times or until mutants with raised ceftriaxone, cefprozil or azithromycin MICs were selected. Of eight ceftriaxone-susceptible parents, ceftriaxone did not select for any resistant mutants, while cefprozil selected for four mutants (MICs 2-4 mg/L after 21-50 subcultures). Among four ceftriaxone-resistant parents, subculturing in ceftriaxone selected for one stable mutant with raised ceftriaxone MIC (>16 mg/L after 21 subcultures) and subculturing in cefprozil selected for one mutant with raised cefprozil MIC (64 mg/L after 44 subcultures). Mutations were observed in pbp2x and pbp1a. Among six azithromycin-susceptible parents, subculturing in azithromycin selected for five resistant mutants (MIC 0.5-32 mg/L after 10-42 passages) and among six azithromycin-resistant strains, subculturing selected for mutants with raised azithromycin MICs in all six strains (MIC 16-32 mg/L after 4-18 passages). All azithromycin-resistant mutants derived from azithromycinsusceptible parents had mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA while all azithromycin-resistant parents and derived mutants had mefE. Single-step mutation rates among the 12 strains at the MIC ranged from 1.5 x 10(-6) to <6.2 x 10(-10) for ceftriaxone, >1.3 x 10(-5) to 8.9 x 10(-8) for cefprozil and >1.1 x 10(-6) to 6.7 x 10(-10) for azithromycin. Multi-step and single-step testing showed that ceftriaxone selected for resistant mutants less often than cefprozil and azithromycin.
Insights
Ceftriaxone rarely selects for resistant pneumococci mutants, unlike cefprozil and azithromycin. This study investigated antibiotic resistance development in Streptococcus pneumoniae, finding lower resistance selection by ceftriaxone.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Antibiotic Resistance
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Widespread use of ceftriaxone for otitis media raises concerns about selecting resistant pneumococcal mutants.
- Understanding the selection potential of different antibiotics is crucial for antimicrobial stewardship.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the ability of sub-inhibitory concentrations of ceftriaxone, cefprozil, and azithromycin to select for resistant mutants in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
- To compare the frequency of resistance selection among these three antibiotics.
Main Methods:
- Sequential subculturing of 12 pneumococcal strains in sub-MICs of ceftriaxone, cefprozil, or azithromycin for up to 50 passages.
- Monitoring of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) for resistance development.
- Identification of genetic mutations (in pbp2x, pbp1a, 23S rRNA, mefE) associated with resistance.
- Determination of single-step mutation rates.
Main Results:
- Ceftriaxone did not select for resistant mutants in susceptible strains, whereas cefprozil selected for four mutants.
- Azithromycin selected for resistant mutants in five of six susceptible strains and in all six resistant strains.
- Ceftriaxone selected resistant mutants less frequently than cefprozil and azithromycin in both multi-step and single-step mutation rate assays.
Conclusions:
- Ceftriaxone appears to be a less potent selector of pneumococcal resistance compared to cefprozil and azithromycin.
- The findings suggest that ceftriaxone's widespread use may pose a lower risk for rapid resistance selection in Streptococcus pneumoniae.
- Genetic analysis revealed mutations in pbp2x, pbp1a, 23S rRNA, and mefE associated with antibiotic resistance.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance


