Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Provocative testing for chest pain.

F Lateef1, W B Gibler

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
|December 5, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department.

Current cardiology reviews·2012
Same author

The "broken heart sydrome": you're likely to have it only once!

Singapore medical journal·2010
Same author

The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence.

International journal of emergency medicine·2009
Same author

Circadian rhythm in cardiac arrest: the Singapore experience.

Singapore medical journal·2008
Same author

Initial risk stratification and presenting characteristics of patients with evolving myocardial infarctions.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ·2008
Same author

Emergency medical services in Singapore.

CJEM·2007
Same journal

Rocuronium dosing for rapid sequence intubation: A retrospective analysis in ED and ICU settings.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Clinical features of adults with undiagnosed acute leukemia in the emergency department: A descriptive study.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Occult intraperitoneal gynecological hemorrhage: An under-evaluated source of hemoperitoneum after blunt trauma.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Racket and paddle sports-related injuries treated in United States emergency departments, 2000-2023.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Prehospital epinephrine as a bridge to survival in traumatic cardiac arrest: A nationwide propensity score-matched analysis.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

Crowdsourcing technologies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest response: A scoping review.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
See all related articles

Chest Pain Centers (CPCs) now identify low-risk patients for efficient care, reducing delays and costs. Provocative testing (PT) aids prognostication, treatment, and disposition in emergency departments.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Chest Pain Centers (CPCs) evolved from acute myocardial infarction evaluation to rapid assessment of all chest pain patients.
  • Identifying low-risk patients (<5% coronary event probability) can prevent unnecessary admissions, improving care and cost-effectiveness.
  • Efficient chest pain management requires reducing therapy delays, "soft" admissions, inappropriate dispositions, and overall costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the evolution and current practices of Chest Pain Centers.
  • To emphasize the role of provocative testing (PT) in managing chest pain patients.
  • To discuss the integration of advanced diagnostic technologies in emergency departments.

Main Methods:

  • Review of Chest Pain Center evolution and management strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of provocative testing (PT) methods, including exercise ECG (GXT), stress echocardiography (SE), and SPECT.
  • Evaluation of PT's role in prognostication, treatment, and disposition decisions.
  • Main Results:

    • A low-risk chest pain patient group (<5% coronary event probability) can be identified.
    • Provocative testing (PT) is increasingly used in emergency departments for patient management.
    • GXT is common, SE is gaining popularity, and stress radionuclide imaging acceptance is growing.

    Conclusions:

    • CPCs facilitate streamlined care and cost-effectiveness by identifying low-risk patients.
    • Provocative testing (PT) is a valuable tool for decision-making in chest pain management.
    • Emergency physicians must adopt state-of-the-art technologies for improved patient care.