Related Experiment Videos
Formative evaluation of a computer-assisted learning program in pharmacology for nursing students
Computers in Nursing
|December 6, 2000
Summary
Formative evaluation of computer-assisted learning (CAL) programs requires integrating objective and naturalistic models during design. This approach ensures a more effective and contextually relevant learning experience for students.
Area of Science:
- Educational Technology
- Health Professions Education
Background:
- Traditional evaluations of computer-assisted learning (CAL) often neglect crucial design and development phases.
- Existing evaluation models tend to favor objectivity over naturalistic approaches, overlooking the learning context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the advantages of combining objective and naturalistic evaluation models for CAL programs.
- To highlight the significance of formative evaluation during the CAL program's lifecycle.
Main Methods:
- Employed a mixed-methods approach for formative evaluation of the Pharmacology Resource for Nurses (PRN) program.
- Utilized student pair observations, questionnaires, and focus group interviews during program design and development.
Main Results:
- The study confirmed the value of diverse data collection methods in CAL program evaluation.
- Integrated evaluation provided insights into complex factors influencing program effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- A combined objective and naturalistic evaluation strategy is essential for effective CAL program development.
- Formative evaluation throughout the design process leads to more useful and student-centered learning tools.