Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lexical access of function versus content words.

S J Segalowitz1, K C Lane

  • 1Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. ssegalow@brocku.ca

Brain and Language
|December 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knowing before we know: conscious versus preconscious top-down processing and a neuroscience of intuition.

Brain and cognition·2007
Same author

Charting the maturation of the frontal lobe: an electrophysiological strategy.

Brain and cognition·2004
Same author

The effect of differing scoring methods for the Tower of London task on developmental patterns of performance.

The Clinical neuropsychologist·2002
Same author

P3 topographical change with task familiarization and task complexity.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2001
Same author

Task complexity and habituation effects on frontal P300 topography.

Brain and cognition·2001
Same author

Event-related potential evidence for age-related differences in attentional allocation during a source monitoring task.

Developmental neuropsychology·2001
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Lexical access for function words is faster than content words, influenced by predictability and familiarity, not just word frequency. Frequency effects differ between word types, particularly for lower-frequency words.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Debate on differential lexical access for function vs. content words.
  • Focus on the frequency effect: higher frequency reducing access times for content words, but not function words.
  • Limitations of previous lexical decision tasks in isolating lexical access.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differential lexical access processes for function and content words.
  • To examine the influence of word predictability (Cloze value) and familiarity (log frequency) on lexical access.
  • To clarify the role of the frequency effect in distinguishing between function and content word processing.

Main Methods:

  • Measured word naming times during sentence reading for meaning.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized sentences to provide context and assess naturalistic reading.
  • Analyzed data considering word predictability and familiarity.

    • Main Results:

    • Confirmed faster lexical access for function words compared to content words.
    • Attributed the speed difference to word predictability and familiarity, not solely frequency.
    • Observed frequency effect differences between word types, specifically for lower-frequency words.

    Conclusions:

    • Lexical access is modulated by word predictability and familiarity.
    • The frequency effect's role in distinguishing word types is nuanced and context-dependent.
    • Findings support and refine neurolinguistic theories of word processing.