Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Grammatical encoding in aphasia: evidence from a "processing prosthesis".

M C Linebarger1, M F Schwartz, J R Romania

  • 1Natural Language Understanding, Unisys Corporation, Malvern, PA 19355, USA. linebarger@alum.mit.edu

Brain and Language
|December 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Monte Carlo transport model comparison with 1A GeV accelerated iron experiment: heavy-ion shielding evaluation of NASA space flight-crew foodstuff.

Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR)·2003
Same author

The influence of phonological context on the sound errors of a speaker with Wernicke's aphasia.

Brain and language·2001
Same author

The role of computational models in neuropsychological investigations of language: reply to Ruml and Caramazza (2000).

Psychological review·2000
Same author

A model-driven analysis of severity, response characteristics, and partial recovery in aphasics' picture naming.

Brain and language·2000
Same author

Effects of morphological complexity on phonological output deficits in fluent and nonfluent aphasia.

Brain and language·2000
Same author

Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: further development and new data.

Brain and language·2000
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Agrammatic aphasia may stem from performance limitations, not lost grammar. An augmentative system improved speech structure by reducing processing demands, supporting the performance hypothesis in language production.

Area of Science:

  • Neurolinguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Speech-Language Pathology

Background:

  • Agrammatic aphasia involves impaired grammatical structure in speech and comprehension.
  • The cause is debated: loss of linguistic knowledge versus performance limitations (e.g., memory).
  • Evidence supports performance limitations in comprehension, but production remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if performance factors, not linguistic deficits, underlie agrammatic production.
  • To test the hypothesis that reducing processing load can improve grammatical structure in agrammatic speech.

Main Methods:

  • An augmentative communication system was employed with individuals with agrammatic aphasia.
  • The system provided no linguistic input, only reducing on-line processing demands.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Grammatical structure of speech production was analyzed before and after system use.

    • Main Results:

    • The augmentative system significantly increased grammatical structure in agrammatic speech.
    • Improvements occurred without adding linguistic information, solely by easing processing.
    • This provides strong evidence for the performance hypothesis in language production.

    Conclusions:

    • Agrammatic aphasia production deficits may result from performance limitations.
    • Reducing cognitive load can enhance grammatical output in aphasia.
    • Findings suggest interventions targeting processing efficiency may benefit agrammatic speakers.