Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly

The aim of this prospective comparative study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic and open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in patients aged >/=75 years.

From January 1993 to December 1998, all patients 75 years of age and older undergoing an elective colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis were included in the study. The patients were divided into the following two groups: group 1 (n = 22) consisted of patients who underwent a laparoscopic procedure; group 2 (n = 24) consisted of patients who underwent an open procedure.

In group 1, there were 12 women and 10 men with a mean age of 77.2 years (range, 75-82); in group 2, there were 14 women and 10 men with a mean age of 78 years (range, 76-84) (p = 0.37). There was no difference between the groups in ASA classification. The operative time was shorter in group 2 (136 vs 234 mins). The postoperative period during which parenteral analgesics were required (5.4 vs 8.2 days, p = 0.001), postoperative morbidity (18% vs 50%, p = 0.02), postoperative length of hospital stay (13.1 vs 20.2 days, p = 0.003), and the inpatient rehabilitation (6 vs 15 patients, p = 0.01) were significantly shorter for group 1 than for group 2. There were no perioperative deaths. The conversion rate was 9% in group 1.

The data from the present study suggest that laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis can be applied safely to older patients with fewer complication, less pain, shorter hospital stay, and a more rapid return to preoperative activity levels than that seen with open colorectal resection.