Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does spinal manipulation have specific treatment effects?

E Ernst1

  • 1Department of Complementary Medicine, School of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, 25 Victoria Park Road, Exeter EX2 4NT, UK.

Family Practice
|December 20, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The "Hoddle Muddle": using faith healers and other complementary therapists in sports medicine.

British journal of sports medicine·1998
Same author

The rise and fall of complementary medicine.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·1998
Same author

The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review.

Cancer·1998
Same author

Does moderate alcohol consumption affect fertility? Follow up study among couples planning first pregnancy.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1998
Same author

[Phytotherapy. 1. Use in diseases of the locomotor system].

Fortschritte der Medizin·1998
Same author

[Phytotherapy. 5: Gastrointestinal tract (2)].

Fortschritte der Medizin·1998
Same journal

Universal-offer HIV testing amongst patients undergoing blood tests in primary care: results from a multi-centre study.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Sustainable healthcare knowledge, experience and curricular perspectives: a cross-sectional survey within the European Young Family Doctors Movement network.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

General practice care models and satisfaction in Australian residential aged care homes: a national survey of GPs, practice nurses, and managers.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Effect of direct access to physiotherapy on prescribing and imaging in primary care for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Virtual and in-person interpretation: a qualitative study from the perspective of professional medical interpreters.

Family practice·2026
Same journal

Temporal changes in chronic disease management in primary care in relation to telehealth policy changes: Australian whole-of-population interrupted time-series analysis.

Family practice·2026
See all related articles

This study found that spinal manipulation may not have specific therapeutic effects beyond placebo. Rigorous sham-controlled trials suggest that perceived benefits are largely due to the placebo effect.

Area of Science:

  • Integrative Medicine
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Clinical Trial Research

Background:

  • Spinal manipulation is a widely used complementary therapy.
  • The specific therapeutic effects of spinal manipulation remain a subject of investigation.
  • Understanding treatment effects beyond placebo is crucial for evidence-based practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if spinal manipulation is associated with specific treatment effects.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of spinal manipulation compared to placebo interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted comprehensive literature searches in major biomedical databases (Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library).
  • Included all available sham-controlled trials investigating spinal manipulation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed the methodological quality of the included studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Seven sham-controlled trials of spinal manipulation were identified.
    • Methodological quality varied, with three trials meeting the highest scientific standards.
    • The collective data, particularly from the three most rigorous studies, did not demonstrate therapeutic effects beyond placebo.

    Conclusions:

    • Sham-controlled trial methodology is applicable to spinal manipulation research.
    • Current evidence suggests that the therapeutic success attributed to spinal manipulation is predominantly a placebo effect.
    • Further high-quality research is needed to clarify the role of spinal manipulation in patient care.