Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: a matter of information structure and question form.

V Girotto1, M Gonzalez

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS--Université de Provence, 29 Av. Schuman, 13621, Aix-en-Provence, France. girotto@univ.trieste.it

Cognition
|December 22, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Naive individuals can reason probabilistically by understanding subsets of information. This cognitive ability emerges when problems are framed to highlight these subset relations, not solely based on probability or frequency formats.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Infection and associated risk factors in the immediate postoperative period of pediatric liver transplantation: a study of 176 transplants.

Clinical transplantation·1998
Same author

Peripheral blood progenitor cells for autologous transplant in children.

Bone marrow transplantation·1998
Same author

Immunophenotypic characterization of plasma cells from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients. Implications for the differential diagnosis between MGUS and multiple myeloma.

The American journal of pathology·1998
Same author

Unusual presentation of tuberculous rheumatism (Poncet's disease) with oral ulcers and tuberculid.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·1998
Same author

[Snake bite accidents in children in Costa Rica: epidemiology and determination of risk factors in the development of abscess and necrosis].

Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology·1998
Same author

The innervation pattern of the radial nerve at the elbow and in the forearm.

Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)·1998

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Human Reasoning

Background:

  • Human probabilistic reasoning is often debated, with theories suggesting inherent limitations or reliance on specific modules like natural frequencies.
  • Previous research explored whether cognitive biases prevent accurate probabilistic judgments or if specific problem formats facilitate correct reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether naive individuals can reason probabilistically by relying on representations of subsets of chances or frequencies.
  • To determine if framing problems to emphasize subset relations enhances conditional probability problem-solving.
  • To challenge existing frequentist and evolutionary accounts of probabilistic reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted seven empirical studies involving naive individuals solving conditional probability problems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated the framing of questions and the structure of problems to activate intuitive principles based on subset relations.
  • Presented problems using both probability and frequency formats to assess reasoning performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Naive individuals successfully solved conditional probability problems when questions and problem structures highlighted subset relations.
    • Performance was consistent across both probability and frequency formats when subset relations were emphasized.
    • Reasoning abilities faltered when problems did not facilitate the consideration of appropriate subsets, regardless of information format.

    Conclusions:

    • Human probabilistic reasoning is facilitated by the ability to represent and infer from subset relations, not solely by probability or frequency formats.
    • The findings suggest a more flexible capacity for probabilistic reasoning in naive individuals than previously assumed.
    • The results contradict the frequentist hypothesis and evolutionary explanations that posit specialized modules for probabilistic reasoning.