Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Use of implantable pacemakers and implantable defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
1Arrhythmia Service, Cardiology Division, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. roger.freedman@hsc.utah.edu
Insights
Dual chamber pacemakers offer limited benefit for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) outflow tract obstruction. Implantable defibrillators are effective for HCM patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Recent data guide the use of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- Controlled studies question the efficacy of dual chamber pacemakers for HCM outflow tract obstruction, suggesting a potential placebo effect.
- Previous claims of ventricular hypertrophy regression with chronic pacing lack recent substantiation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current data on implantable electronic devices for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- To evaluate the effectiveness of pacemakers and defibrillators in managing HCM complications.
- To identify risk factors for sudden cardiac death in HCM patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of controlled studies on dual chamber pacing for HCM outflow tract obstruction.
- Analysis of recent reports on risk factors for sudden death in HCM.
- Evaluation of data on implantable defibrillator efficacy in HCM patients with ventricular arrhythmias.
Main Results:
- Dual chamber pacing shows minimal benefit for HCM outflow tract obstruction, with no evidence of hypertrophy regression.
- A normal blood pressure response during exercise may indicate a low risk of sudden death in HCM.
- Sudden cardiac death risk in HCM is directly proportional to the extent of left ventricular hypertrophy.
- Implantable defibrillators are effective in terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmias in HCM.
Conclusions:
- Dual chamber pacemakers are not recommended for outflow tract obstruction in HCM based on current evidence.
- Implantable defibrillators should be considered for HCM patients at significant risk of sudden cardiac death.
- Left ventricular hypertrophy extent and exercise blood pressure response are important prognostic indicators in HCM.
Abstract:
Recent data have emerged to help guide the use of implantable pacemakers and implantable defibrillators in patients who have hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Controlled studies of the use of dual chamber pacemakers to treat outflow tract obstruction in HCM have shown little benefit, and have raised the possibility that earlier favorable reports were demonstrating an element of placebo effect. In particular, there is no recent support for earlier claims of regression of ventricular hypertrophy from chronic dual chamber pacing. Several reports have added to our understanding of the risk factors for sudden death in HCM. A normal blood pressure response to exercise appears to identify a subset of patients at low risk for sudden death. In a recent study of a large number of HCM patients, the risk of sudden death was found to be directly proportional to the extent of left ventricular hypertrophy. There is accumulating evidence that the implantable defibrillator is highly effective in terminating malignant ventricular arrhythmias in HCM patients, and HCM patients thought to be at significant risk for sudden death should be offered defibrillator implantation.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents

