Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Telling people about screening programmes and screening test results: how can we do it better?

E Goyder1, A Barratt, L M Irwig

  • 1School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. e.goyder@sheffield.ac.uk

Journal of Medical Screening
|December 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Informed screening decisions require clear communication of benefits and harms. Presenting screening test results probabilistically, rather than as simple positive/negative, can improve understanding and decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing the embedded researcher role: Learning from the first year of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC), Doncaster, UK.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

What is the evidence that advertising policies could have an impact on gambling-related harms? A systematic umbrella review of the literature.

Public health·2023
Same author

Learning from the challenges of undertaking an evaluation of a multi-partner housing support initiative delivered within a hospital setting.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2022
Same author

The price of precision: trade-offs between usability and validity in the World Health Organization Health Economic Assessment Tool for walking and cycling.

Public health·2021
Same author

Multiple deprivation and geographic distance to community physical activity events - achieving equitable access to parkrun in England.

Public health·2020
Same author

Intraoperative use of adjuvants for opioid sparing: a cross-sectional survey of anaesthetists in teaching hospitals in South Australia.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2018

Area of Science:

  • Medical Screening
  • Health Communication
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Effective screening requires individuals to weigh benefits against harms.
  • Current information provided to patients about screening tests is often insufficient for informed decision-making.
  • Understanding screening test results is crucial for patient comprehension and subsequent actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of current information delivery in screening programs.
  • To advocate for improved, probabilistic information regarding screening benefits, harms, and results.
  • To explore alternative methods for presenting screening information beyond dichotomous positive/negative outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of current screening information practices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the adverse consequences of dichotomizing screening results.
  • Proposal of alternative information presentation strategies, including probabilistic data and anchoring.
  • Main Results:

    • The traditional dichotomization of screening results into positive/negative is problematic.
    • Presenting information probabilistically, including benefits and harms, is essential for informed choices.
    • Alternative methods like quantitative, qualitative, and anchored risk communication can enhance understanding.

    Conclusions:

    • Current screening information practices are inadequate for informed decision-making.
    • Probabilistic data presentation should replace dichotomous results in screening.
    • Further research and evaluation are needed to develop and implement improved screening communication strategies.