Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Design of phase I and II clinical trials in oncology and ethical issues involved
1Department of Medical Oncology, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074. gohbc@nuh.com.sg
Introduction:
There are 2 broad classes of anticancer drugs that require different approaches to development. The classical cytotoxic agents have low therapeutic indices and therefore traditionally have different developmental strategies from non-oncology agents. The newer anticancer agents that target the signal transduction pathway and antiangiogenesis pathway have characteristics similar to non-oncology agents and will change the paradigm for drug development in oncology.
Methods:
To review the issues involved in phase I and II cancer trials, and to describe how these issues have been addressed.
Results And Conclusions:
There are significant scientific and ethical issues in phase I and II cancer clinical trials, which influence the design of these studies. Nonetheless, these trials are vital for the successful development of anticancer agents. The development of novel anticancer agents that target signal transduction and antiangiogenesis has posed great challenges, and changes in the conventional cytotoxic paradigm of development are expected for these agents.
Insights
Developing novel anticancer drugs targeting signal transduction and antiangiogenesis presents challenges. These newer agents require different clinical trial strategies compared to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs.
Area of Science:
- Oncology Drug Development
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Anticancer drugs fall into two main classes: classical cytotoxic agents and newer agents targeting signal transduction or antiangiogenesis.
- Classical cytotoxic agents have low therapeutic indices, necessitating distinct developmental strategies compared to non-oncology drugs.
- Newer targeted anticancer agents share characteristics with non-oncology drugs, potentially altering oncology drug development paradigms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the challenges and issues inherent in phase I and II cancer clinical trials.
- To outline how these identified issues have been addressed in the context of anticancer drug development.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of phase I and II cancer trials.
- Analysis of developmental strategies for cytotoxic versus targeted anticancer agents.
Main Results:
- Phase I and II cancer trials face significant scientific and ethical considerations that impact study design.
- Novel anticancer agents targeting signal transduction and antiangiogenesis present unique developmental challenges.
- The conventional cytotoxic drug development model is expected to evolve for these newer agents.
Conclusions:
- Despite challenges, phase I and II clinical trials are crucial for advancing anticancer agent development.
- The development of targeted therapies necessitates a shift from traditional cytotoxic drug development approaches.
- Future oncology drug development will likely see changes in trial design to accommodate novel therapeutic strategies.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients