Related Experiment Videos
Publication bias: a brief review for clinicians
V M Montori1, M Smieja, G H Guyatt
1Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Nutrition and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. 55905, USA.
Abstract:
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide the highest level of evidence to guide clinical decisions and inform practice guidelines. Publication bias results from the selective publication of studies based on the direction and magnitude of their results--studies without statistical significance (negative studies) are less likely to be published. Bias results from pooling the results from published studies alone leading to overestimation of the effectiveness of the intervention. In this review we define publication bias, how it affects the results of systematic reviews, how it can be detected and minimized, and how it can be prevented.
Related Concept Videos
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Clinical Trials: Overview
Confirmation Biases
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: