Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Monitoring, risk adjustment and strategies to decrease cesarean rates.

K D Gregory1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Burns Allen Research Institute and University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, 90048, USA. gregory@cshs.org

Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology
|December 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Professional society recommended interventions for enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery in the United States: a multidisciplinary Delphi study.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

Examining the effect of hospital-level factors on mortality of very low birth weight infants using multilevel modeling.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2011
Same author

Identifying women most likely to benefit from prevention strategies for postpartum hemorrhage.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2009
Same author

Variation in elective primary cesarean delivery by patient and hospital factors.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2001
Same author

Variation in vaginal breech delivery rates by hospital type.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2001
Same author

Fetal echogenic bowel: parameters to be considered in differential diagnosis.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2001
Same journal

Management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in group prenatal care research.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Complex benign gynecology in perimenopause: current evidence and future directions.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Role of insulin in female reproduction.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Urinary tract involvement in endometriosis: current evidence and clinical insights into navigating diagnosis and management.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Updates in ultrasound imaging of adenomyosis and clinical impacts.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Cesarean delivery rates are crucial for assessing healthcare quality. Research explores statistical methods, risk factors, and interventions to reduce cesarean births, emphasizing the need for better comparison strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Cesarean delivery rates are a key indicator of healthcare quality, sparking ongoing debate among medical professionals and policymakers.
  • Numerous studies have investigated methods for monitoring and reporting cesarean rates.
  • Factors influencing cesarean delivery, including clinical and non-clinical risks, have been extensively studied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current research on cesarean rates as a quality indicator.
  • To identify statistical strategies, risk factors, and interventions related to cesarean delivery.
  • To highlight areas for future research in monitoring and comparing cesarean rates.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies published over a defined period.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of research on statistical monitoring and reporting of cesarean rates.
  • Examination of studies on clinical and non-clinical risk factors for cesarean delivery.
  • Review of interventions aimed at reducing cesarean delivery rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant research exists on statistical methods for monitoring cesarean rates.
    • Various clinical and non-clinical risk factors contributing to cesarean delivery have been identified.
    • Clinical interventions targeting labor management show potential for decreasing cesarean rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Cesarean delivery rates remain a critical focus for healthcare quality assessment.
    • Further development and refinement of statistical strategies are essential for accurate and meaningful comparisons of cesarean rates.
    • Future research should prioritize robust methodologies for adjusting cesarean rates based on risk factors.