Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
Comparative study of use of Diastat versus standard wall PTFE grafts in upper arm hemodialysis access
P J Almonacid1, E C Pallares, A Q Rodriguez
1Fundacion Hospital Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain.
Insights
Brachioaxillary Diastat grafts show lower patency and more complications than standard PTFE grafts for hemodialysis access. This study highlights potential risks associated with Diastat vascular access in patients requiring dialysis.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Nephrology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Vascular access is crucial for hemodialysis.
- Brachioaxillary grafts are used for upper arm vascular access.
- Comparing different graft types is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of Diastat brachioaxillary grafts versus standard wall brachioaxillary PTFE grafts.
- To evaluate complications and graft survival rates in hemodialysis patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study comparing two groups of hemodialysis patients (n=40 each).
- Patients received either Diastat or standard wall PTFE grafts between 1994-1997.
- Groups were matched for age, diabetes mellitus, surgical technique, and prior vascular access.
Main Results:
- Diastat grafts demonstrated lower patency rates compared to sPTFE grafts.
- Higher complication rates were observed in patients with Diastat grafts.
- Standard PTFE grafts showed superior performance in this patient cohort.
Conclusions:
- Diastat grafts for upper arm hemodialysis access are associated with inferior outcomes.
- Standard wall brachioaxillary PTFE grafts appear to be a more reliable option.
- Further research may be warranted to explore reasons for Diastat graft underperformance.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to review our experience with using brachioaxillary Diastat vascular grafts (Diastat) compared to standard wall brachioaxillary PTFE grafts (sPTFE) in two similar groups of hemodialysis patients. We conducted a retrospective study comparing complications and graft survival in two similar groups (in terms of age, diabetes mellitus, surgical technique, and previous vascular access) of hemodialysis patients during the period 1994-1997 who had received Diastat (n = 40) or (sPTFE) (n = 40) grafts. We found that the Diastat graft for upper arm hemodialysis access has lower patency and higher complication rates than sPTFE grafts.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure

