Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An improved double sampling procedure based on the variance.

M A Proschan1, J Wittes

  • 1Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, II Rockledge Center, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7938, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7938, USA. ProschaM@nih.gov

Biometrics
|December 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zalunfiban at First Medical Contact for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

NEJM evidence·2025
Same author

Baseline CD4+ T-cell counts predict HBV viral kinetics to adefovir treatment in lamivudine-resistant HBV-infected patients with or without HIV infection.

HIV clinical trials·2013
Same author

Vascular and upper gastrointestinal effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: meta-analyses of individual participant data from randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2013
Same author

Cycling of gut mucosal CD4+ T cells decreases after prolonged anti-retroviral therapy and is associated with plasma LPS levels.

Mucosal immunology·2009
Same author

Treatment intensification does not reduce residual HIV-1 viremia in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2009
Same author

Subgroups time to change the question?

Evidence-based cardiovascular medicine·2005
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Adaptive sample size recalculation methods are crucial for accurate study power. This study introduces an unbiased variance estimation method using all data, ensuring a controlled Type I error rate for robust statistical analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Methods
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Accurate sample size calculation is vital for study power, preventing underpowered or overpowered research.
  • Adaptive sample size methods, using subsample variance for recalculation, are gaining popularity.
  • Traditional methods like Stein's procedure are underutilized due to perceived data exclusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address limitations of existing adaptive sample size methods.
  • To develop an unbiased variance estimation technique utilizing all available data.
  • To ensure the proposed method maintains a controlled Type I error rate.

Main Methods:

  • Application of the Helmert transformation to analyze variance estimation.
  • Development of a novel unbiased variance estimator incorporating all study data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mathematical proof demonstrating the Type I error rate does not exceed alpha.

    • Main Results:

    • The naive approach using all data for variance estimation leads to underestimation of the true variance.
    • The proposed method provides an unbiased variance estimate using the complete dataset.
    • The Type I error rate of the developed procedure is rigorously proven to be controlled.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed unbiased variance estimation method offers a statistically sound approach for adaptive sample size calculations.
    • This method overcomes the limitations of previous techniques by utilizing all data effectively.
    • The guaranteed control of the Type I error rate enhances the reliability of studies employing this adaptive strategy.