Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do hospital fall prevention programs work? A systematic review.

D Oliver1, A Hopper, P Seed

  • 1Academic Department of Elderly Care, Guy's Kings and St. Thomas' School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
|December 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost-effectiveness analysis of health tapestry, a complex primary care program for older adults: a post-hoc analysis.

BMC primary care·2024
Same author

Depletion of COPI in cancer cells: the role of reactive oxygen species in the induction of lipid accumulation, noncanonical lipophagy and apoptosis.

Molecular biology of the cell·2022
Same author

Suicide, self-harm and thoughts of suicide or self-harm in infectious disease epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2021
Same author

EAN guideline on palliative care of people with severe, progressive multiple sclerosis.

European journal of neurology·2020
Same author

Beyond 'find and fix': improving quality and safety through resilient healthcare systems.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2020
Same author

Lifestyle information and commercial weight management groups to support maternal postnatal weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour: the SWAN feasibility randomised controlled trial.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2019

Hospital fall prevention programs show a potential 25% reduction in fall rates. However, methodological limitations in studies, particularly those using historical controls, may introduce bias, necessitating improved research design.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare quality and safety
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Clinical research methodology

Background:

  • Hospital falls are a significant patient safety concern.
  • Effective fall prevention programs are crucial for reducing patient harm and healthcare costs.
  • Existing literature on the efficacy of hospital fall prevention programs requires systematic evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze published hospital fall prevention programs for their effect on patient fall rates.
  • To assess the methodological quality of studies evaluating fall prevention interventions.
  • To identify effective interventions and guide future research in this area.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of published hospital fall prevention programs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of studies reporting fall rates before and during intervention.
  • Estimation of risk ratios and confidence intervals, employing random effects meta-analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria; 10 provided sufficient data for meta-analysis.
    • A pooled effect rate ratio of 0.79 (95% CI 0.69, 0.89) suggests a potential reduction in fall rates.
    • Randomized controlled trials showed no significant effect (pooled rate ratio 1.0), while prospective studies with historical controls indicated a reduction (0.76).

    Conclusions:

    • A pooled reduction of approximately 25% in fall rates may be attributable to interventions, but bias from historical controls is a concern.
    • The lack of effect in randomized controlled trials may stem from study design limitations.
    • Future research and clinical programs must prioritize robust study design and detailed intervention analysis, including compliance and cost-effectiveness.