Related Experiment Videos

Bilateral versus unilateral mandibular block anesthesia in a pediatric population

C College1, R Feigal, A Wandera

  • 1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Michigan, USA. ccollege@worldnet.att.net

Pediatric Dentistry
|January 2, 2001
PubMed

Insights

Bilateral mandibular nerve blocks in children show no increased risk of soft tissue trauma compared to unilateral blocks. This study found no contraindications for bilateral anesthesia in pediatric patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Anesthesiology
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Dental Anesthesia

Background:

  • Post-anesthetic soft tissue trauma is a concern in pediatric dental procedures.
  • Understanding the risks associated with different anesthesia techniques is crucial for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the incidence of post-operative soft tissue trauma between unilateral and bilateral mandibular nerve blocks in pediatric patients.
  • To evaluate other complications associated with these anesthesia techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 320 pediatric patients aged 2 to 18 years undergoing routine operative treatment.
  • Patients received either unilateral or bilateral mandibular nerve block anesthesia.
  • Post-operative soft tissue trauma was assessed via phone survey.

Main Results:

  • Overall, 13% of patients experienced post-operative soft tissue trauma.
  • Trauma incidence varied by age group, with the youngest (< 4 years) showing the highest frequency.
  • In the youngest age group, unilateral blocks had significantly higher trauma rates (35%) than bilateral blocks (5%).

Conclusions:

  • This study provides the first data on post-anesthetic soft tissue trauma prevalence in a pediatric population.
  • The findings suggest that bilateral mandibular block anesthesia is safe and does not increase the risk of soft tissue trauma in children.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia01:16

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

Intravenous regional anesthesia or the Bier block technique is used to anesthetize a specific limb or extremity. It uses exsanguinated or blood-drained vessels to transport local anesthetics or LAs to the peripheral nerve trunks. Lidocaine without vasoconstrictors like epinephrine is most commonly used for this technique. Other drugs used are prilocaine, ropivacaine, and chloroprocaine. Bupivacaine is not recommended for this technique due to its high cardiac toxicity.
One of the advantages of...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia01:30

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia

Depending on the target organ, local anesthetics (LAs) can be administered via various routes. In surface anesthesia, LAs are applied directly to the surface of the skin or mucous membranes. It is widely used for topical skin numbing before venipuncture or minor surgical procedures. Commonly used surface local anesthetics are lidocaine or benzocaine sprays or creams. Surface anesthesia occurs within 5 minutes and lasts for about 60 minutes. One of the main disadvantages of topical anesthesia is...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia01:11

Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia

Spinal anesthetics are given during lower abdomen and limb surgeries to block sensory and motor neurons. They are administered in the mid to low lumbar regions, primarily acting on the cauda equina's nerve roots. The blockade level depends on the local anesthetic (LA) concentration. Usually, low LA concentrations are sufficient to block sensory fibers, while only high LA concentrations block motor fibers. Other factors like injection volume and speed, the patient's posture, and the drug...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics01:19

Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

Depolarizing blockers are administered through intravenous injection. Succinylcholine is the most common choice of depolarizing blockers in emergency clinical practices. Although they have a rapid onset, they readily diffuse away from the motor end plate into the extracellular fluid. They are metabolized by enzymes such as liver butyrylcholinesterase and plasma pseudocholinesterases. This produces a short duration of action, typically 5-10 minutes long, unlike nondepolarizing blockers, which...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions01:27

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers prevent the membrane depolarization of muscle cells and inhibit muscle contraction. These are usually administered with anesthetics to achieve complete muscle relaxation. Upon administration, these drugs first block the small, rapidly contracting muscles of the face and hands, followed by the larger muscles of the trunk and the intercostal muscles. The diaphragm is the last muscle to be affected.
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview01:24

Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview

Intravenous anesthetics are drugs administered parenterally to induce anesthesia or sedation. Propofol is a widely used agent formulated as a 1% emulsion in soybean oil, glycerol, and egg phosphatide. It induces rapid anesthesia primarily due to its rapid distribution from the bloodstream to target tissues and is metabolized in the liver. However, it can cause significant pain on injection and hypertriglyceridemia. Fospropofol, a water-based prodrug of propofol, lacks these adverse effects.