Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detecting failed WBC-reduction processes: computer simulations of intermittent and continuous process failure.

M R Adams1, D M Fisher, L J Dumont

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0532, USA. Barky106@hotmail.com

Transfusion
|January 3, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Observation of the Z→ψℓ^{+}ℓ^{-} Decay in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Observation of Higgs Boson Decay to Bottom Quarks.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Observation of the χ_{b1}(3P) and χ_{b2}(3P) and Measurement of their Masses.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Elliptic Flow of Charm and Strange Hadrons in High-Multiplicity p+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=8.16  TeV.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Constraining Gluon Distributions in Nuclei Using Dijets in Proton-Proton and Proton-Lead Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model in Events with High-Momentum Higgs Bosons and Missing Transverse Momentum in Proton-Proton Collisions at 13 TeV.

Physical review letters·2018

Current WBC-reduced component testing uses small sample sizes, potentially missing failures. Detecting intermittent or high-variance WBC-reduction failures requires significantly more samples than typically analyzed.

Area of Science:

  • Blood banking and transfusion medicine
  • Process control and quality assurance
  • Statistical analysis in healthcare

Background:

  • Routine process control for White Blood Cell (WBC)-reduced components involves testing only 1% of units (4-5 samples/month).
  • The statistical power of these small sample sizes to detect process failures has been difficult to assess prospectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sensitivity of sample size in detecting continuous or intermittent failures in WBC-reduction processes.
  • To determine the adequacy of current sampling protocols for ensuring product safety.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations generated log-normal distributions of residual WBC counts.
  • Simulated continuous failure by altering mean/SD; intermittent failure by creating bimodal distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed the power of sample sizes ranging from 4 to 60 to detect deviations using standard control criteria.

    • Main Results:

    • Low-variance, normally distributed failures were readily detected with small sample sizes (e.g., 4 samples).
    • Detecting >5% intermittent (bimodal) or high-variance failures with 90% confidence required approximately 40 samples, comparing individual values to the cutoff.

    Conclusions:

    • Sampling error can limit the detection of high-variance or bimodal WBC count distributions.
    • Detecting shifts in normal distributions is sensitive to small samples, but identifying complex failures necessitates larger sample sizes and individual value assessment.
    • Further research is needed to define actual failure distributions and clinically relevant quality limits for WBC-reduction processes.