Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retroperitoneal approach for aortic surgery: is it worth it?

F R Arko1, W T Bohannon, M Mettauer

  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Scott & White Clinic, 2401 S 31st Street, TX 76508, Temple, USA.

Cardiovascular Surgery (London, England)
|January 4, 2001
PubMed
Summary

The retroperitoneal approach for aortic surgery significantly reduces intensive care unit (ICU) time, postoperative ileus, and hospital costs compared to the transperitoneal approach. This method enhances patient recovery and satisfaction while improving the value of aortic surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Natural conception resulting in a ruptured heterotopic pregnancy in a multiparous woman.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2020
Same author

Deficiencies with current aortic endografts.

The Journal of cardiovascular surgery·2015
Same author

Gender, age and the marriage market: Evidence on marriage in late adulthood in Russia.

Journal of cross-cultural gerontology·2014
Same author

Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.

International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology·2012
Same author

Why the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should not extend reimbursement indications for carotid artery angioplasty/stenting.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2012
Same author

Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2011

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Surgical Approaches
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Contrasting reports exist regarding the benefits of retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approaches for aortic surgery.
  • Earlier hospital discharges and reduced complications are suggested with the retroperitoneal method.
  • This study aimed to compare the cost-efficiency and outcomes of both approaches at a single institution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches for aortic surgery.
  • To determine the most cost-efficient method for aortic surgery while maintaining high standards of care.
  • To evaluate clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and hospital costs.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective vascular registry and retrospective review of 120 patients undergoing aortic surgery (60 transperitoneal, 60 retroperitoneal).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients were randomly assigned to surgeons and followed a standardized clinical pathway.
  • Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, operative details, length of stay, complications, costs, and patient satisfaction.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant demographic differences; however, the retroperitoneal group had increased comorbidities (renal insufficiency, obesity) and included redo surgeries.
    • The retroperitoneal group showed statistically significant reductions in ICU days, postoperative ileus, and total length of stay (P<0.0001).
    • Substantial cost reductions (P<0.01) and improved patient recovery and satisfaction were observed in the retroperitoneal group, with fewer pulmonary complications.

    Conclusions:

    • The retroperitoneal approach facilitated adherence to a clinical pathway, leading to decreased ICU time, ileus, crystalloid use, and length of stay.
    • The transperitoneal approach group experienced difficulties progressing on the clinical pathway.
    • The retroperitoneal approach resulted in significant cost savings and enhanced the value of aortic surgery for patients and the institution.