Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Parameter estimation methods for single neuron models.

J Tabak1, C R Murphey, L E Moore

  • 1Equipe de Neurobiologie, CNRS URA 256, Université de Rennes 1. joel@spine.ninds.nih.gov

Journal of Computational Neuroscience
|January 4, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Elevated fasting vs post-load glucose levels and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes: a population-based study.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2019
Same author

TET2 binds the androgen receptor and loss is associated with prostate cancer.

Oncogene·2016
Same author

DNA and RNA profiling of excavated human remains with varying postmortem intervals.

International journal of legal medicine·2016
Same author

Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma Among Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2016
Same author

Genomic copy number alterations in clear cell renal carcinoma: associations with case characteristics and mechanisms of VHL gene inactivation.

Oncogenesis·2013
Same author

Common genetic variants in the 9p21 region and their associations with multiple tumours.

British journal of cancer·2013
Same journal

Hierarchical learning creates invariant schema within plastic neural networks.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Intrinsic chaos control in cortical circuits: A minimal E-I-M rate model for primary visual cortex.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Modeling developmental spiking behavior driven by ionic current dynamics of mouse and human inner hair cells using a calcium-enhanced Izhikevich framework.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

A biophysically grounded model of glutamatergic synaptic transmission integrating glutamate transport, receptor kinetics, and electrotonic effects.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

When can neuronal activity-dependent homeostatic plasticity maintain circuit-level properties?

Journal of computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

A charge conservative finite volume discretization of the Hodgkin-Huxley model.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

This study compares time-domain and frequency-domain methods for estimating neuron model parameters. The frequency-domain method is faster and more accurate for neuronal modeling, especially with noisy data.

Area of Science:

  • Computational neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Mathematical modeling

Background:

  • Advancements in computational technology enable complex neuronal models.
  • Accurate parameter estimation is crucial for understanding neuronal function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare time-domain and frequency-domain methods for estimating parameters of neuronal models.
  • To evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of each method.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized classical voltage traces from current pulse injections (time domain).
  • Employed neuron responses to sinusoidal stimuli (frequency domain).
  • Applied methods to simple (passive soma) and complex (active conductances) neuron models.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Both methods accurately estimated parameters across all tested models.
  • The frequency-domain method demonstrated higher speed and fewer errors in cable parameter estimation compared to the time-domain method.
  • Frequency-domain analysis allows for local sensitivity analysis to guide parameter estimation and protocol selection.

Conclusions:

  • The frequency-domain method is recommended for fitting single-cell neuron models due to its efficiency and robustness.
  • Running estimation multiple times can help identify optimal solutions and parameter interactions, especially with noisy data.
  • Sensitivity analysis derived from frequency-domain models aids in selecting optimal stimulation protocols for accurate parameter estimation.