Related Experiment Videos
[Treatment of residual acoustic neurinomas]
M Falcioni1, L O Piccioni, A Taibah
1Reparto ORL, Ospedale di Chiari. maurizio.falcioni@otologic.it
Abstract:
Generally the main objective of acoustic neurinoma (AN) surgery is to totally remove the tumor associated with minimum morbidity. Nevertheless, in some cases residual tumor fragments are intentionally or accidentally left in place. These residues can lead to new growth. The present study provides a retrospective analysis of 14 cases of residual AN have undergone surgery at the Otology Group in Piacenza from 1987 to 1999. All these patients had previously undergone at least one retrosigmoidal exeresis although only one had been performed at the Otology Group. All patients except 1 were affected by anacusia at the time of surgery. The list of post-operative deficits included 2 hemipareses, 3 irreversible facial paralysis with consequent corneal opacity in 2 cases, 1 dysmetria and 1 paralysis of the abducent nerve. The patients had also undergone the following additional treatments: 1 emergency revision to drain a cerebellar hematoma, 3 ventricle-peritoneal derivations, 1 double application of stereotactic radiotherapy and 2 surgical procedures for facial plasty. Ten cases underwent the revision surgery at the Otologic Group using a translabyrinthine approach and 4 using a transcochlear approach. Tumor removal was deemed complete in all cases. The sole post-operative complications were a subcutaneous hematoma at the point where abdominal fat was removed and a temporary paralysis of the abducent nerve. Post-operative hospitalization was an average of 6.9 days. Analysis of the results showed that AN must be operated at selected centers in order to reduce the post-operative neurological deficit and the percentage of residual tumor. It also indicated that the retrosigmoid approach has a higher risk of accidentally leaving tumor residues than the other approaches. Finally, in the presence of a residual AN, the translabyrinthine approach offers the greatest advantages.
Insights
Surgery for acoustic neurinoma (AN) can leave residual tumor fragments, risking regrowth. Revision surgery, particularly using the translabyrinthine approach, can achieve complete tumor removal with fewer complications.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Otolaryngology
- Oncology
Context:
- Acoustic neurinoma (AN) surgery aims for complete tumor removal with minimal morbidity.
- Residual tumor fragments can lead to tumor regrowth.
- This study analyzes 14 cases of residual AN treated between 1987 and 1999.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the outcomes of surgical revision for residual acoustic neurinoma.
- To compare different surgical approaches for residual AN.
- To identify factors influencing post-operative deficits and outcomes.
Summary:
- Retrospective analysis of 14 patients with residual AN who underwent revision surgery.
- Previous surgeries included retrosigmoidal exeresis; most patients had pre-existing anacusia.
- Post-operative deficits from initial surgeries were significant; revision surgeries utilized translabyrinthine or transcochlear approaches.
Impact:
- Revision surgery can achieve complete tumor removal in residual AN cases.
- The translabyrinthine approach appears advantageous for residual AN compared to other methods.
- Operating on AN at specialized centers may reduce neurological deficits and residual tumor rates.