Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Configural and component processings in face recognition: comparison between inversion and negation effects].

T Tsujii1, Y Itoh

  • 1Division of Human Relations, Graduate School of Keio University, Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345.

Shinrigaku Kenkyu : the Japanese Journal of Psychology
|January 5, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Face recognition is disrupted differently by inversion and negation. While inversion primarily affects configural processing, negation impacts both component and configural face recognition aspects equally.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

NIRS-based neurofeedback learning systems for controlling activity of the prefrontal cortex.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2013
Same author

Zonisamide up-regulated the mRNAs encoding astrocytic anti-oxidative and neurotrophic factors.

European journal of pharmacology·2012
Same author

Malignant transformation in a mature testicular teratoma left untreated for more than 50 years since childhood.

Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology·2003
Same author

Improvement of central motor conduction after bone marrow transplantation in adrenoleukodystrophy.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2003
Same author

RhoA is associated with invasion and lymph node metastasis in upper urinary tract cancer.

BJU international·2003
Same author

The rho/rho-kinase pathway is involved in the progression of testicular germ cell tumour.

BJU international·2002

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Previous research indicates challenges in recognizing inverted or negatively presented faces.
  • Understanding the specific cognitive processes affected by these distortions is crucial for face recognition models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether face inversion and photographic negation disrupt the same cognitive processes in face recognition.
  • To differentiate the impact of inversion versus negation on component versus configural face processing.

Main Methods:

  • A same-different face decision task was employed.
  • Stimuli involved subtle changes to either component (e.g., eye size) or configural (e.g., feature placement) information.
  • Faces were presented either inverted or in photographic negative.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Photographic negation equally disrupted both component and configural processing.
  • Face inversion selectively disrupted configural processing more than component processing.
  • These findings suggest distinct mechanisms underlying the effects of inversion and negation.

Conclusions:

  • Face inversion and photographic negation selectively disrupt different cognitive aspects of face recognition.
  • The 'negation effect' cannot be explained solely by component versus configural processing differences.
  • Distinct processing pathways are implicated for inversion and negation effects in facial perception.