Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

HMO malpractice: have the floodgates opened?

E Hansen1

  • 1Managed Liability Associates, Washington, DC, USA.

Managed Care Interface
|January 6, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thermodynamics of driven systems via the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Measurement of ion acceleration and diffusion in a laser-driven magnetized plasma.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

New onset of systemic lupus erythematosus following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
Same author

Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons in Decays of W Bosons Using a Dilepton Displaced Vertex in sqrt[s]=13  TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Web-based training intervention to increase physical activity level and improve health for adults with intellectual disability.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2022
Same author

Observation of WWW Production in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2022
Same journal

Changes in hospital readmissions for diabetes-related conditions. Differences by payer.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Heart disease and managed care.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

A conversation with James K. Min, MD.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Acute coronary syndromes.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

Improving outcomes in cardiovascular disease.

Managed care interface·2008
Same journal

The effect for oncology of the national coverage determination for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Managed care interface·2008
See all related articles

The Supreme Court ruled HMO physician decisions are not fiduciary acts under ERISA. However, this ruling may encourage more lawsuits against managed care plans.

Area of Science:

  • Health Law
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Employee Benefits Law

Background:

  • Managed care organizations (MCOs) face legal scrutiny regarding physician decision-making.
  • The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) governs employee benefit plans, including health plans.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of ERISA in healthcare is critical for MCOs and patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Pegram v. Herdrich.
  • To examine how the ruling affects fiduciary responsibilities of Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) physician employees.
  • To assess the potential for increased litigation against managed care plans post-ruling.

Main Methods:

  • Legal analysis of the Pegram v. Herdrich Supreme Court holding.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the distinction between eligibility decisions and medical treatment decisions.
  • Review of ERISA's fiduciary provisions and their application to healthcare providers.

    • Main Results:

    • The Court held that mixed eligibility and treatment decisions by HMO physicians are not fiduciary acts under ERISA.
    • The ruling was welcomed by the managed care industry, potentially reducing ERISA-based claims.
    • The Court's specific exclusions may open avenues for malpractice claims and other ERISA litigation.

    Conclusions:

    • The Pegram v. Herdrich decision provides clarity on ERISA fiduciary duties in mixed-treatment cases.
    • Despite industry applause, the ruling's nuances may inadvertently increase legal challenges for managed care plans.
    • Future litigation may focus on malpractice and non-fiduciary ERISA claims against MCOs.