Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Utilizing the Antigen Capsid-Incorporation Strategy for the Development of Adenovirus Serotype 5-Vectored Vaccine Approaches
Published on: May 6, 2015
Immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent combined vaccine compared with separate administration of
Insights
A new liquid hexavalent vaccine (Hexavac) demonstrated comparable immunogenicity and safety to separate vaccines in infants. This combination vaccine provides adequate protective immune responses against six infectious diseases with a single injection.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
- Vaccinology
- Immunology
Background:
- Hexavalent vaccines offer a convenient alternative to multiple injections for infant immunization.
- Assessing the immunogenicity and safety of novel combination vaccines is crucial for public health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent vaccine (Hexavac) against a combination of reference vaccines (Pentavac and H-B-Vax II).
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multicenter, comparative, open-label trial randomized 848 infants to receive either Hexavac or the reference vaccines at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.
- Seroprotection and seroconversion rates were assessed 1 month post-vaccination and compared using 95% confidence intervals to establish clinical equivalence.
Main Results:
- Hexavac met predefined criteria for clinical equivalence, eliciting similar seroprotection and seroconversion rates against all six antigens (>90%).
- Antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) for hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae were higher with reference vaccines, while poliovirus GMTs were enhanced with Hexavac.
- Both vaccine regimens were well-tolerated, with no significant difference in the frequency of local or systemic adverse events, and no vaccine-related serious adverse events.
Conclusions:
- The liquid hexavalent vaccine (Hexavac) is generally well-tolerated and provides adequate protective immune responses against six infectious diseases.
- This single-injection formulation simplifies infant immunization schedules, ensuring protection against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b.
Objective:
The immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent vaccine (diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio vaccine-hepatitis B-polyribosyl ribitol phosphate conjugated to tetanus protein; Hexavac; Aventis Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France) are compared with those of reference vaccines [diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio vaccine reconstituting lyophilized purified Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus protein vaccine (Pentavac; Aventis Pasteur MSD) and hepatitis B vaccine (H-B-Vax II; Aventis Pasteur MSD)] injected separately at the same visit in a prospective multicenter, comparative, open label trial.
Methods:
Infants were randomized to receive Hexavac (n = 423) or Pentavac and H-B-Vax II (n = 425) as a primary immunization series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Seroprotection and seroconversion rates against all antigens at 1 month after the primary series were compared between the two vaccine groups with 95% confidence intervals (CI0.95) and were considered clinically equivalent (not inferior) when the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval on the difference (reference, hexavalent) was below predefined differences.
Results:
Hexavac met and surpassed the pre-defined criteria for clinical equivalence to Pentavac and H-B-Vax II given concomitantly. It elicited similar seroprotection and seroconversion rates against all antigens. Seroprotection and seroconversion rates obtained 1 month after the third dose of Hexavac were >90% for all antigens. The postimmunization antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) for hepatitis B and purified Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide were about 2-fold higher in infants who received the reference vaccines than in infants who had received Hexavac. GMTs for poliovirus antibodies tended to be enhanced in infants vaccinated with Hexavac. GMTs for all other antigens were very similar among both groups. Hexavac was generally well-tolerated. At least one local reaction was reported in 20.3% of Hexavac injections compared with 15.8% at the Pentavac injections site and 3.8% at the H-B-Vax II injections site. These reactions were generally mild and transient. At least one systemic adverse event was reported in 45.7% of Hexavac injections compared with 42.2% of Pentavac and H-B-Vax II injections (mild fever, irritability and drowsiness were most frequently reported). The frequency of adverse events was not significantly different between groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse event occurred during the study.
Conclusion:
This liquid hexavalent vaccine was generally well-tolerated and provided immune responses adequate to be protective against six infectious diseases with a single injection, given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age.
More Related Videos
09:03Rapid In Vivo Assessment of Adjuvant's Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Generation Capabilities for Vaccine Development
Published on: June 19, 2018
13:53Homogeneous Glycoconjugate Produced by Combined Unnatural Amino Acid Incorporation and Click-Chemistry for Vaccine Purposes
Published on: December 19, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Cross-reactivity
Vaccinations
Immunological Memory
What is Immunological Memory?
Immunological memory is an integral function of the immune system that allows it to recognize and react more rapidly and effectively to pathogens previously encountered. This feature is...
Active versus Passive Immunity
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...
Vaccines