Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Can laparoscopy be performed safely early after laparotomy?

I Hamzaoğlu1, K Saribeyoğlu, T Karahasanoğlu

  • 1Department of Surgery, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School, Turkey. hulya@turk.net

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
|January 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Early subsequent laparotomy significantly impairs abdominal wound healing. Laparoscopy, however, does not negatively affect healing and offers a safer alternative to repeated laparotomy, reducing patient morbidity and mortality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short- and mid-term results of diode laser treatment in pilonidal sinus disease and the role of endoscopic camera use on outcomes.

Techniques in coloproctology·2023
Same author

Robotic complete mesocolic excision for transverse colon cancer can be performed with a morbidity profile similar to that of conventional laparoscopic colectomy.

Techniques in coloproctology·2020
Same author

Laparoscopic management of incarcerated broad ligament hernia in a patient with bilateral parametrium defects - a video vignette.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2020
Same author

The da Vinci Xi system for robotic total/subtotal colectomy vs. conventional laparoscopy: short-term outcomes.

Techniques in coloproctology·2019
Same author

Robotic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis for splenic flexure cancer with the da Vinci Xi robotic platform - a video vignette.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2019
Same author

Standardized totally robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer - a video vignette.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2019
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Surgical innovation
  • Abdominal surgery
  • Wound healing research

Background:

  • Early subsequent laparotomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates.
  • Laparoscopic procedures can manage many indications for early relaparotomy, potentially reducing risks.
  • Concerns about wound dehiscence and ventral hernias limit laparoscopic adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally compare the effects of early subsequent laparotomy versus laparoscopy on abdominal wound healing in the early post-celiotomy period.

Main Methods:

  • 120 Wistar-Albino rats underwent a 4-cm median laparotomy and were divided into three groups.
  • Group 1: Control (no additional treatment).
  • Group 2: Early subsequent laparotomy on postoperative day 3.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Group 3: Pneumoperitoneum (laparoscopy simulation) on postoperative day 3.
  • Wound bursting pressure and tensile strength were assessed at 5 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.

    • Main Results:

    • Subsequent laparotomy significantly impaired abdominal wound healing (P < 0.05).
    • Pneumoperitoneum showed no statistically significant difference in wound healing parameters compared to the control group (P > 0.05).

    Conclusions:

    • Pneumoperitoneum does not adversely affect abdominal wound healing.
    • Early subsequent laparotomy severely impairs wound healing.
    • Laparoscopy presents a viable alternative to high-risk early relaparotomy.