Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for testing compounds for DNA adduct formation.

M V Reddy1

  • 1Genetic and Cellular Toxicology, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP
|February 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Preferences for Selecting Surgeons for Joint Replacement Surgery in India.

Cureus·2024
Same author

Decompression of Paralabral Cyst near Axillary Nerve: A Case Report.

Journal of orthopaedic case reports·2023
Same author

Arthroscopic Anterior Capsule Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft and Knotless Fibretak: A Case Report.

Journal of orthopaedic case reports·2023
Same author

Growth Mechanism of Micro/Nano Metal Dendrites and Cumulative Strategies for Countering Its Impacts in Metal Ion Batteries: A Review.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Cause and Mitigation of Lithium-Ion Battery Failure-A Review.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Custom 3D Printed Jigs in Salvage Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Failed Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Fixation: A Case Report.

Journal of orthopaedic case reports·2020
Same journal

The NTP Chronic Inhalation Study Does Not Support an Inherent Lung Cancer Hazard of Talc: Implications of Lung Particle Overload and Maximum Tolerated Dose.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Consideration of Carcinogenicity and Mode of Action Information by an Independent Expert Panel to Support Derivation of No-Significant-Risk-Level Values for Vinyl Acetate Monomer.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Which carcinogenicity study should I use? Automated identification of reliable studies.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Adoption of artificial intelligence in drug review across the lifecycle: Transformation of regulatory decision-making.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular outcomes following intrauterine and lactational exposure to cyantraniliprole in male Wistar rats.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same journal

Pesticide residue and mycotoxin occurrence in apples and their impact on human health in Morocco.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
See all related articles

Detecting DNA adducts is crucial for assessing toxicological risk. Methods like 32P-postlabeling are key for uncharacterized adducts, though full risk assessment remains challenging.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • DNA adduct formation is a critical endpoint in genetic toxicology.
  • Studies are initiated when standard tests yield conflicting results or tumors are found in non-genotoxic compounds.
  • Understanding DNA adducts aids in evaluating potential mutagenic and carcinogenic risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of methods for detecting DNA adducts.
  • To discuss the applicability of various detection methods for uncharacterized adducts.
  • To highlight the challenges in assessing toxicological risk from DNA adducts.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of DNA adduct detection methods including 32P-postlabeling assay, radioactive test chemicals, physicochemical methods, and immunoassays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Detailed discussion of 32P-postlabeling and radiochemical methods for uncharacterized adducts.
  • Comparison with methods suitable for chemically characterized adducts.

    • Main Results:

    • 32P-postlabeling and radiochemical methods are most applicable for uncharacterized DNA adducts.
    • Physicochemical methods and immunoassays are limited to characterized adducts or those with specific chemical properties.
    • Comprehensive risk assessment requires data on adduct nature, quantity, stability, and cellular processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Assessing toxicological risk from uncharacterized DNA adducts is difficult due to data limitations.
    • Further research is needed to refine methods and gather data for accurate risk evaluation.
    • Accurate risk assessment necessitates understanding adduct stability, repair, and mutagenic potential.