Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gell and Coombs's classification: is it still valid?

J Descotes1, G Choquet-Kastylevsky

  • 1Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 69437 Cedex 03, Lyon, France. jacques.descotes@chu-lyon.fr

Toxicology
|February 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015

The Gell and Coombs classification for drug allergies is outdated and does not reflect current immunology. A revised classification is needed for accurate preclinical safety evaluation of new drugs.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology
  • Toxicology

Background:

  • The Gell and Coombs classification, proposed over 30 years ago, categorizes drug allergies into four types: anaphylaxis (Type I), antibody-mediated cytotoxic (Type II), immune complex-mediated (Type III), and delayed type hypersensitivity (Type IV).
  • This classification remains widely used despite its limitations in encompassing the full spectrum of immune responses to drugs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adequacy of the Gell and Coombs classification for modern drug allergy understanding.
  • To propose a basis for a more current and comprehensive classification system for drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on drug allergy classifications.
  • Analysis of current immunological understanding of drug-induced hypersensitivity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The Gell and Coombs classification is insufficient, accommodating only a limited number of drug allergies.
  • It fails to incorporate contemporary insights into immune system responses.
  • Three distinct categories—pseudo-allergic reactions, antibody-mediated reactions, and cell-mediated reactions—are identified as more relevant.

Conclusions:

  • The Gell and Coombs classification is not recommended for preclinical safety evaluation of novel therapeutic agents due to its limitations.
  • A modern classification based on pseudo-allergic, antibody-mediated, and cell-mediated reactions is proposed.
  • This revised approach offers a more accurate framework for understanding and evaluating drug hypersensitivity.