Ethical implications of aggressive obstetric management at less than 28 weeks of gestation

R Ahner1, D Bikas, M Rabl

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cornell University, New York, USA.

Insights

Infants born at 24 weeks gestational age or later, with aggressive obstetric management, have significantly lower mortality and morbidity. Survival without disability improves substantially with each week of gestation after 23 weeks.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Perinatology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Evaluating outcomes for extremely preterm infants (23-28 weeks gestation) receiving aggressive obstetric management.
  • Assessing the impact of gestational age on neonatal survival and long-term development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the outcomes of infants born between 23 and 28 weeks of gestational age.
  • To analyze neonatal mortality, early morbidity, and one-year corrected age outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective collection of prenatal data from medical records.
  • Determination of neonatal mortality and early morbidity.
  • Assessment of outcomes at one year corrected for postconceptional age.

Main Results:

  • Serious early morbidity decreased with increasing gestational age; all infants before 24 weeks had serious morbidity.
  • Mortality and birth weight significantly declined with increasing gestational age (p<0.001).
  • Disability at one year corrected age was 67% for infants <24 weeks vs. 13% for those >=24 weeks. Survival without disability was 12.5% at 23 weeks, increasing to 70% at 27 weeks.

Conclusions:

  • The viability of fetuses at 23-24 weeks remains controversial due to uncertain clinical benefits versus harms.
  • Infants at 24 weeks gestation should be considered viable, with 50% survival and 78% of survivors disability-free.
  • Neonatal mortality and survival with disability continue to decrease with advancing gestational age.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Standards of Care I01:22

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights: