Related Experiment Videos
[Comparative study of different methods of pleural drainage in an experimental model of pneumothorax]
F Vázquez Rueda1, M V Moñiz Mora, R Núñez Núñez
1Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil Infanta Cristina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz.
Objective:
To observe the usefulness of several procedures for draining pneumothorax in an animal model and to identify the best pleural drainage system with minimal impairment of respiratory function.
Method:
Thirty-four New Zealand white rabbits weighting 1687 +/- 78 g and aged a mean 59 days were randomly placed in groups as follows. Unilateral pneumothorax was induced in the first problem group (P1) rabbits (n = 10) by thoracostomy, with pleural drainage. In the second problem group (P2) of rabbits (n = 10), bilateral pneumothorax was similarly induced by thoracostomy with pleural drainage. The control groups underwent unilateral (C1; n = 7) and bilateral (C2; n = 7) thoracostomy and drainage. Every 7 minutes the chest tube was connected successfully in each animal to an underwater seal with a dead-space volume of 35.58 ml (neonatal Bülau unit) or to a 3,940 ml system (chest drainage unit) and to pleural aspirations of -5 and -20 cmH2O. We analyzed mortality, fluctuations of the hydrostatic column of the underwater seal, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), PaCO2, SaO2, pH and arterial blood gas measures.
Results:
Intraoperative mortality was significantly higher (particularly in the P2 group) when connection was to a large volume system without aspiration. Recovery after pneumothorax was more satisfactory with aspiration of -5 and -20 cmH2O.
Conclusions:
The results suggest that a pleural drainage unit with a large dead space between the pleural cavity and the underwater seal is a frequent cause of respiratory failure or insufficiency. We believe that when an underwater seal without pleural suction is applied, the Bülau unit should be used with the smallest possible volume.