Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modified Burch colposuspension: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

H Fatthy1, M El Hao, I Samaha

  • 1Central Heliopolis Office 11757, P.O. Box 344, Cairo, Egypt.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
|February 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High efficacy of a characterized lytic bacteriophage in combination with thyme essential oil against multidrug-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in chicken products.

Iranian journal of veterinary research·2021
Same author

Insights on toxin genotyping, virulence, antibiogram profiling, biofilm formation and efficacy of disinfectants on biofilms of Clostridium perfringens isolated from poultry, animals and humans.

Journal of applied microbiology·2020
Same author

Contrasted resistance and resilience of two mangrove forests after exposure to long-term and short-term anthropic disturbances.

Marine environmental research·2019
Same author

Limited impact of several years of pretreated wastewater discharge on fauna and vegetation in a mangrove ecosystem.

Marine pollution bulletin·2018
Same author

Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2017
Same author

Immune response to vaccination with DNA-Hsp65 in a phase I clinical trial with head and neck cancer patients.

Cancer gene therapy·2009
Same journal

Does a minimally invasive surgery fellowship impact surgical experience among gynecology residents?

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Chronic pelvic pain.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Body piercing affecting laparoscopy: perioperative precautions.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Ureteral endometriosis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

Trocar-assisted sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence: three-year follow-up.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
Same journal

New helical incision for removal of large uteri during laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists·2005
See all related articles

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension offers equal efficacy to classic Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence. The laparoscopic approach results in lower morbidity and a shorter hospital stay, making it the preferred method.

Area of Science:

  • Urogynecology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Genuine stress incontinence affects many women.
  • Traditional Burch colposuspension is an established surgical treatment.
  • Laparoscopic techniques offer potential advantages in surgical recovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus classic open Burch colposuspension.
  • To evaluate complications, efficacy, and morbidity of both procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
  • Seventy-four women diagnosed with genuine stress incontinence were included.
  • Procedures compared were laparoscopic and classic open Burch colposuspension.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic surgery had significantly shorter operating times (70 vs. 53 minutes) and less blood loss (43 vs. 241 ml).
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopy required less postoperative analgesia and had a shorter hospital stay (36 vs. 76 hours).
  • Return to light work was faster with laparoscopy (8.5 vs. 31.5 days), with comparable success rates (88-91% at 18 months).

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension demonstrates equal efficacy to the classic open procedure.
  • The laparoscopic approach is associated with significantly lower morbidity, fewer complications, and reduced hospital stay.
  • Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension is the preferred surgical option due to improved patient recovery and outcomes.