Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

20 mJ, 1 ps Yb:YAG Thin-disk Regenerative Amplifier
Published on: July 12, 2017
Erbium: YAG versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy
J M Teichman1, K F Chan, P P Cecconi
1Division of Urology, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Purpose:
We test the hypothesis that erbium:YAG (Er:YAG) lithotripsy is more efficient than holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) lithotripsy.
Materials And Methods:
Human calculi composed of greater than 97% calcium oxalate monohydrate and cystine were studied. Calculi were irradiated in water using Er:YAG or Ho:YAG lasers. Er:YAG lithotripsy was done with a 425 microm sapphire optical fiber at a pulse energy of 50 mJ at 10 Hz. Ho:YAG lithotripsy was performed with a 365 microm low hydroxy optical fiber at a pulse energy of 500 mJ at 10 Hz or a 425 microm sapphire optical fiber at a pulse energy of 50 mJ at 10 Hz. Fragmentation was defined as the initial stone mass minus the final dominant fragment mass and normalized for incident laser fluence (energy per unit area of fiber tip).
Results:
Mean fragmentation plus or minus standard deviation for calcium oxalate monohydrate was 38 +/- 27 mg for Er:YAG and 22 +/- 6 for Ho:YAG (low hydroxy silica fiber) versus 5 +/- 1 for Ho:YAG (sapphire fiber, p = 0.001). When fragmentation was normalized for incident laser fluence given different optical fiber sizes, mean fragmentation efficiency was 53.6 +/- 38.7 g-microm2/J for Er:YAG lithotripsy compared with 22.6 +/- 6.4 for Ho:YAG (low hydroxy silica fiber) lithotripsy (p = 0.04). Mean cystine fragmentation was 15 +/- 3 mg for Er:YAG versus 9 +/- 1 for Ho:YAG (sapphire fiber, p = 0.0005).
Conclusions:
Er:YAG lithotripsy is more efficient than Ho:YAG lithotripsy.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management

