Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

07:40
Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
[Working in Swiss animal experimentation committees]
1Zürcher Tierschutz, Zürichbergstrasse 263, CH-8044 Zürich.
ALTEX
|January 1, 1994
Summary
Animal protection delegates in Swiss Animal Experimentation Committees are generally satisfied with their roles and licensing decisions. While some criticisms exist, their views largely align with other committee members.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Ethics
- Animal Welfare Science
- Regulatory Affairs
Background:
- Swiss law grants animal protection organizations representation in Animal Experimentation Committees.
- These committees review research proposals involving animals to prevent suffering and advise on licensing.
- Animal welfare is a critical consideration in scientific research and teaching.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the satisfaction levels of members within Animal Experimentation Committees.
- To identify specific aspects of committee work and licensing that influence member satisfaction.
- To compare the perspectives of animal protection delegates with those of other committee members.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire was distributed to 86 members of Animal Experimentation Committees in Switzerland.
- Respondents indicated preferences on statements regarding their roles and committee functions.
- Data from 28 respondents (14 animal protection delegates, 14 others) were analyzed using Chi2-tests.
Main Results:
- Overall, committee members reported high job satisfaction and contentment with licensing outcomes.
- Analysis revealed specific areas of criticism regarding committee operations and responsibilities.
- While animal protection delegates expressed a tendency towards more critical viewpoints, statistical differences compared to other members were minimal.
Conclusions:
- Members of Animal Experimentation Committees generally find their work fulfilling.
- Despite some criticisms, the current system appears to function satisfactorily for most members.
- The integration of animal protection perspectives does not lead to significant divergence in overall satisfaction levels.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

