Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
Published on: August 15, 2010
Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new
1Division of Life Sciences, University of Toronto at Scarborough, Ontario, Canada. joordens@psych.utoronto.ca
Abstract:
The authors use the qualitative differences logic to demonstrate that 2 separate memory influences underlie performance in recognition memory tasks, familiarity and recollection. The experiments focus on the mirror effect, the finding that more memorable stimulus classes produce higher hit rates but lower false-alarm rates than less memorable stimulus classes. The authors demonstrate across a number of experiments that manipulations assumed to decrease recollection eliminate or even reverse the hit-rate portion of the mirror effect while leaving the false-alarm portion intact. This occurs whether the critical distinction between conditions is created during the test phase or manipulated during the study phase. Thus, when recollection is present, it dominates familiarity so that the hit-rate portion of the mirror effect primarily reflects recollection; when recollection is largely absent, the opposite pattern associated with the familiarity process emerges.
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Hindsight Biases
Autobiographical Memory
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
The Looking Glass Self

