Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Group collaboration in recognition memory.

S E Clark1, A Hori, A Putnam

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside 92521-0426, USA. steven.clark@ucr.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimisation of Radiation Therapy in Bladder Preservation Therapy for Patients With Clinical Stage T2N0M0 Bladder Cancer.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2022
Same author

The investigation and management of unilateral nipple discharge.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2020
Same author

Cost utility analysis of pharmacist counseling care for breast cancer chemotherapy outpatients.

Die Pharmazie·2019
Same author

Combating 'fake news' and social stigma after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant incident-the importance of accurate longitudinal clinical data.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2019
Same author

Death of the sole doctor at Takano Hospital 6 years after the Fukushima nuclear crisis-who is responsible for health care delivery in the Fukushima disaster zone?

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2017
Same author

Seeing shapes in seemingly random spatial patterns: Fractal analysis of Rorschach inkblots.

PloS one·2017
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Group collaboration enhances recognition memory, but not for rejecting incorrect items. This study differentiates group effects from true collaboration, defined as information exchange, finding collaboration specifically aids target recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Group performance often exceeds individual performance due to resource pooling.
  • Distinguishing between general group effects and specific collaborative processes is crucial.
  • Previous research has not clearly separated these two phenomena in recognition tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate group collaboration in item and associative recognition memory.
  • To differentiate between group effects (e.g., resource pooling) and collaborative processes (interactive information exchange).
  • To determine if collaborative processes uniquely contribute to recognition accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Examined group collaboration in item recognition and associative recognition tasks.
  • Defined collaboration as interactive information exchange within groups.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared group performance against individual performance, controlling for resource pooling effects.

    • Main Results:

    • A group advantage was observed in both item and associative recognition.
    • This group advantage could not be explained solely by resource pooling mechanisms.
    • Collaborative facilitation was reliably found for recognizing targets.
    • No significant collaborative facilitation was observed for rejecting distractors.

    Conclusions:

    • Group collaboration, defined as interactive information exchange, enhances target recognition.
    • Resource pooling alone does not fully explain group advantages in recognition memory.
    • The benefits of group dynamics in memory tasks are specific to successful identification, not error rejection.