Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Errors in applying the NSD concept.

C G Orton

    Radiology
    |April 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Approximately 50% of studies using the Nominal Standard Dose (NSD) concept contain errors. This analysis details common conceptual and mathematical mistakes in NSD calculations, offering methods for correction to improve radiation therapy planning accuracy.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    High-dose-rate brachytherapy may be radiobiologically superior to low-dose rate due to slow repair of late-responding normal tissue cells.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2001
    Same author

    Medical physics: some recollections in diagnostic X-ray imaging and therapeutic radiology.

    Radiology·2000
    Same author

    With the expectation that cancer detection and treatment will occur increasingly at the molecular and gene levels, medical physics trainees should take courses in molecular biology and genetics.

    Medical physics·2000
    Same author

    Pulsed brachytherapy: a formalism to account for the variation in dose rate of the stepping source.

    Medical physics·1999
    Same author

    High and low dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma.

    Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·1998
    Same author

    Study of lung density corrections in a clinical trial (RTOG 88-08). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·1998
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiation Oncology
    • Medical Physics
    • Radiotherapy

    Background:

    • The Nominal Standard Dose (NSD) is a concept used in radiotherapy to quantify radiation dose.
    • Accurate dose calculation is critical for effective cancer treatment and minimizing side effects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the frequency and nature of errors in published studies utilizing the Nominal Standard Dose (NSD) concept.
    • To identify common conceptual and mathematical inaccuracies in NSD calculations.
    • To provide guidance on correcting these errors and improving the reliability of radiotherapy dose reporting.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic review and analysis of scientific literature employing the Nominal Standard Dose (NSD).
    • Identification and categorization of conceptual and mathematical errors in dose calculations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantitative assessment of error magnitudes, averaging +/- 7%.

    • Main Results:

    • Approximately 50% of analyzed papers contained errors in their application of the Nominal Standard Dose (NSD).
    • Errors were found to be both conceptual and mathematical, with an average magnitude of +/- 7%.
    • Common mistakes in applying NSD, partial tolerances, and time, dose, and fractionation (TDF) factors were identified.

    Conclusions:

    • A significant portion of radiotherapy research contains errors in Nominal Standard Dose (NSD) calculations.
    • Addressing these conceptual and mathematical errors is crucial for accurate radiation therapy.
    • The study provides methods for error elimination and a conversion table for NSD, partial tolerances, and TDF factors to enhance consistency.