Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The GM debate: science or scaremongering?

P J Dale1

  • 1John Innes Centre, Norwich.

Biologist (London, England)
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Public apprehension regarding genetic modification often stems from a lack of scientific understanding, fueled by sensationalized media and activist language. Addressing these concerns requires focusing on societal and human aspects alongside scientific details.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pollen dimorphism and anther culture in barley.

Planta·2014
Same author

In vitro response of leaf tissues from Lolium multiflorum - a comparison with leaf segment position, leaf age and in vivo mitotic activity.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Somaclonal variation inLolium multiflorum L. andL. temulentum L.

Plant cell reports·2013
Same author

Field performance of transgenic potato plants compared with controls regenerated from tuber discs and shoot cuttings.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Reconsideration of pollen dispersal data from field trials of transgenic potatoes.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Leiomyomatosis of the oesophagus.

Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition·2004

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Societal Impact of Science

Background:

  • Public discourse on genetic modification is often characterized by a disconnect from scientific intricacies.
  • Emotive language and media portrayals contribute to public apprehension regarding genetic technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the societal and human dimensions of public perception surrounding genetic modification.
  • To explore the influence of media and pressure groups on public understanding and acceptance of genetic technologies.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of public discourse and media content related to genetic modification.
  • Examination of common phrases and concerns expressed by non-scientists.

Main Results:

  • Public concerns about genetic modification are frequently rooted in ethical considerations rather than detailed scientific understanding.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Sensationalized terminology like 'Frankenstein food' significantly shapes negative public opinion.

    • Conclusions:

    • Effective communication about genetic modification must address public values and societal implications.
    • Bridging the gap between scientific advancements and public perception requires a focus on human and societal lessons.