Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Retention.

J C Davenport1, R M Basker, J R Heath

  • 1University of Birmingham, UK. john.davenport@btclick.com

British Dental Journal
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Betabox: a beta particle imaging system based on a position sensitive avalanche photodiode.

Physics in medicine and biology·2013
Same author

The effects of ethylene oxide sterilization on the in vitro cytotoxicity of a bone replacement material.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
Same author

Maximal entropy inference of oncogenicity from phosphorylation signaling.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2010
Same author

One year clinical performance and post-operative sensitivity of a bioactive dental luting cement--a prospective clinical study.

Swedish dental journal·2010
Same author

The profile of patients referred to an outreach restorative dentistry clinic over the last 10 years has changed.

The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry·2005
Same author

Electrical addressing of confined quantum systems for quasiclassical computation and finite state logic machines.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2005
Same journal

Frank Clare Wilkinson CBE (1889-1979) dental professor in Manchester, Australia and London, second dean of the Eastman Dental Institute.

British dental journal·2026
Same journal

Admissions factors and their associations with performance in dental education: a quantitative study exploring undergraduate admissions at a UK dental school.

British dental journal·2026
Same journal

Dentistry Show Birmingham reflects a profession looking forward.

British dental journal·2026
Same journal

Hyperemesis gravidarum and the dental patient.

British dental journal·2026
Same journal

Posterior fibre-reinforced bridges: a reproducible clinical protocol for tooth replacement.

British dental journal·2026
Same journal

The GDC and Fitness to Practise (FtP): recognition of the effects of a FtP investigation on registrants and attempts at tackling the climate of fear.

British dental journal·2026
See all related articles

This study explains how removable partial dentures (RPDs) are retained and discusses direct retainer types. It covers factors affecting retentive clasps and guides clasp selection for better denture stability.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Prosthodontics
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are crucial for restoring function and aesthetics.
  • Effective retention is paramount for RPD success and patient satisfaction.
  • Understanding retention mechanisms is key to improving RPD design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the mechanisms of retention for removable partial dentures (RPDs).
  • To review and categorize the various types of direct retainers used in RPDs.
  • To analyze factors influencing the efficacy of retentive clasps and inform clasp selection.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of RPD retention mechanisms.
  • Classification of direct retainer types.
  • Analysis of biomechanical and clinical factors affecting clasp performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Detailed description of RPD retention principles.
  • Categorization of direct retainers including clasps and attachments.
  • Identification of key factors (e.g., clasp design, tooth contour, material) influencing retentive force and stability.

Conclusions:

  • Effective RPD retention relies on understanding direct retainer mechanics.
  • Appropriate clasp selection based on influencing factors ensures optimal RPD stability and function.
  • Further research into novel retention systems could enhance RPD outcomes.