[Executive and amnestic functions of a group of first-degree relatives of schizophrenic patients]

Several lines of evidence seem to indicate that some neurocognitive measures could be phenotypic markers of predisposition to schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to investigate 21 patients with schizophrenia, 51 of their first-degree relatives and 46 nonpsychiatric controls, with a series of tests known to be sensitive to prefrontal cortical damage--the Trail Making Test, part B (TMT B), the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and a verbal fluency test (VFT)- and/or sensitive to temporo-hippocampic dysfunctions: verbal and visual memory and verbal learning tests from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (Wechsler, 1987). Since parents and siblings share on average 50% of their genes with the schizophrenic proband, firstly we predicted that the first-degree relatives' performance would be at an intermediate level between patients and control subjects and secondly, we expected that a higher proportion of relatives than of control subjects would be impaired. The patients demonstrated deviant patterns of neuropsychological performance on the three tests sensitive to frontal dysfunctions and on most of the memory and learning tests. In the relative group, performance on the TMT B, VFT, immediate verbal recall and verbal learning was at an intermediate level between both other groups and significantly impaired compared to control subjects. However, the relative group did not differ from the control group on the WCST, immediate visual recall, and delayed verbal and visual recalls. Furthermore, compared to the control group, the percentages of patients and relatives who scored one standard deviation below the mean control group were significantly higher for the VFT and immediate verbal recall scores. Among all the tests studied, the verbal fluency and the immediate verbal recall appeared to be valuable phenotypic markers of schizophrenia since: (i) their mean scores were poorer in the patient and in the relative groups, (ii) the percentages of patients and relatives with poor performance were higher than the percentage of controls, (iii) these deficits were not due to poorer general intellectual abilities in the relative group, (iv) these deficits did not correlate with anxiety or depression scores.