Related Experiment Videos
[Propofol and remifentanil in day surgery]
Minerva Anestesiologica
|February 24, 2001
Summary
General anesthesia (AG) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) with propofol and remifentanil offer good conditions for day surgery. MAC provides quicker emergence times compared to AG, but benzodiazepine addition prolongs recovery.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pharmacology
- Day Surgery
Background:
- Propofol and remifentanil are commonly used anesthetic agents in day surgery settings.
- Comparing general anesthesia (AG) with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is crucial for optimizing patient recovery and resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare general anesthesia (AG) versus monitored anesthesia care (MAC) using propofol and remifentanil in a day surgery setting.
- To evaluate intraoperative and postoperative clinical conditions, and emergence times for both anesthetic techniques.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 218 patients undergoing plastic or proctologic surgery as day hospital patients.
- Anesthesia administered included general anesthesia (AG) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC) using propofol and remifentanil infusions.
- Data collected included various emergence intervals, drug consumption, and intraoperative/postoperative adverse events; analyzed using variance analysis.
Main Results:
- Emergence intervals were significantly longer under AG compared to MAC.
- Drug consumption was approximately double under AG versus MAC.
- AG showed a higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia; MAC had more frequent SaO2 decrease and itching. Benzodiazepine addition significantly prolonged recovery.
Conclusions:
- Propofol-remifentanil provides excellent conditions for day surgery, ensuring good anesthesia with rapid emergence.
- Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) offers faster recovery than general anesthesia (AG).
- The addition of benzodiazepines, even at low doses, significantly extends discharge times.