Arrhythmias in acute pericarditis. An endomyocardial biopsy study
A D Ristić1, B Maisch, G Hufnagel
1University Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Medical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. ristic@mailer.uni-marburg.de
Insights
Patients with acute pericarditis without myocarditis have fewer life-threatening arrhythmias compared to those with confirmed myocarditis. However, transient atrial fibrillation is more common in acute pericarditis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Arrhythmias in acute pericarditis are of controversial origin, potentially myocardial or pericardial.
- Distinguishing between pericarditis and myocarditis is crucial for patient management and prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in patients with acute pericarditis (without myocarditis) versus those with biopsy-proven acute myocarditis/perimyocarditis.
- To elucidate the origin of arrhythmias in acute cardiac inflammatory conditions.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of electrocardiograms and 24-hour Holter recordings.
- Biventricular endomyocardial biopsy with histological and immunohistochemical analysis to confirm myocarditis.
- Clinical work-up including echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
Main Results:
- Patients with acute pericarditis (no myocarditis) showed significantly less frequent paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (5% vs 40%) and ventricular fibrillation (0% vs 20%) compared to myocarditis patients.
- Atrial fibrillation occurred more often in acute pericarditis (20% vs 0%).
- No significant differences were observed in low voltage, ST/T wave changes, or degree of AV block between groups.
Conclusions:
- Acute pericarditis without biopsy-proven myocarditis is associated with a lower incidence of life-threatening arrhythmias than acute myocarditis/perimyocarditis.
- Transient atrial fibrillation is more prevalent in acute pericarditis than in myocarditis.
Abstract:
It is still controversial whether the arrhythmias in acute pericarditis are of myocardial or pericardial origin. The aim of the present study was to investigate the occurrence of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in patients with acute pericarditis with no endomyocardial biopsy evidence of myocarditis (group 1: 40 patients, 65% males, mean age 45.6 +/- 15.7 years, mean heart rate [HR] 98.7 +/- 22.2 beats per minute) in comparison to endomyocardial biopsy proven acute myocarditis/perimyocarditis (group 2: 10 patients, 3/10 with perimyocarditis, 70% males, mean age 46.1 +/- 15.8 years, mean heart rate 76.7 +/- 33.1 beats per minute). At the initial assessment all patients underwent comprehensive clinical work-up including echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and endomyocardial biopsy. In all patients biventricular endomyocardial biopsy was performed using standard femoral approach and Schikumed 7 F or 8 F bioptomes. Tissue samples were stained by H & E, v. Gieson and independently reviewed by two cardiac pathologists. In addition immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry were performed, and only patients fulfilling Dallas and World Heart Federation criteria were selected for group 2. Comparative analysis of electrocardiograms and 24-hour Holter recordings at initial presentation revealed in group 1 vs group 2 significantly less frequent paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (5% vs 40%), and ventricular fibrillation (0 vs 20%), in contrast to atrial fibrillation that occurred more often (20% vs 0) (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, in the group 2 one patient died due to VF and two patients underwent ICD implantation. Low voltage (40% vs 30%) and ST/T wave changes (47.5% vs 30%), as well as the incidence of the II degree AV block (5% vs 0) and complete AV block (2.5% vs 10%) were not significantly different between the groups. In conclusion, patients with pericarditis and no endomyocardial biopsy indications of myocarditis had significantly less often life threatening rhythm disorders in contrast to patients with endomyocardial biopsy proven acute myocarditis/perimyocarditis. On the contrary, incidence of transitory atrial fibrillation was higher in acute pericarditis, than in myocarditis.
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias


