Flexible percutaneous pericardioscopy: inherent drawbacks and recent advances
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
P M Seferovic1, A D Ristić, R Maksimovic
1University Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Medical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. eseferov@eunet.yu
Abstract:
Pericardioscopy enables endoscopic inspection and aimed biopsy of the parietal and visceral pericardium. To elucidate possible technical modifications contributing to the feasibility, diagnostic value and safety of the procedure, pericardioscopy with an Olympus HYF-1T flexible endoscope was performed in 32 patients (53.1% males, mean age 46.2 +/- 13.1 years) with pericardial effusions. In all patients, the initial step of the procedure was subxiphoid fluoroscopically controlled pericardiocentesis and drainage of the pericardial effusion. An Olympus FB-41ST biopsy forceps was applied for endoscopically guided pericardial biopsies. Standard sampling was used in 22/32 patients (3 to 6 samples/patient) and extensive sampling in 10/32 patients (18 to 20 samples/patient). In additional 12 patients pericardial biopsy was performed without pericardioscopy, under fluoroscopic control. Endoscopic visualization was clearly superior when pericardial effusion was partially replaced with 100 to 300 ml of air (29/32 procedures) in comparison to 3/32 procedures in which the pericardial effusion was replaced with warm normal saline (37 degrees C). In patients with hemorrhagic effusion (12/32), we either repeatedly injected and removed 100 to 150 ml volumes of normal saline (37 degrees C), or postponed pericardioscopy for 2 to 3 days of active drainage. The specificity of endoscopic findings is low and not decisive for the diagnosis. However, pericardioscopy is significantly contributing to the diagnostic value of pericardial biopsy, especially regarding establishing the new diagnosis and etiology of the pericardial disease. Sampling efficiency was also significantly higher for procedures using aimed pericardial biopsy with standard and extensive sampling compared to procedures performed under fluoroscopy: 86.2%, 87.3%, and 43.7%, respectively. No major complications directly related to the procedure were encountered. Minor complications included: short-run ventricular tachycardia (6.3%), pain at the sheath entry site (75%) and transient fever (37.5%). In conclusion, pericardioscopy with Olympus HYF-1T, after air instillation, is a technically complex, but safe procedure that enables excellent visualization and extensive pericardial sampling with improved diagnostic value of pericardial biopsies.
Insights
Pericardioscopy, a minimally invasive procedure, significantly enhances the diagnostic value of pericardial biopsies by improving visualization and sampling. This technique, particularly with air instillation, proves safe and effective for diagnosing pericardial diseases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endoscopy
- Diagnostic Procedures
Background:
- Pericardial effusions require accurate diagnosis for effective management.
- Traditional pericardial biopsy methods may have limitations in diagnostic yield and visualization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic value, and safety of pericardioscopy for pericardial effusion.
- To explore technical modifications, such as air instillation, to optimize the procedure.
Main Methods:
- Pericardioscopy was performed using a flexible endoscope in 32 patients with pericardial effusions.
- Subxiphoid pericardiocentesis and drainage preceded the endoscopic procedure.
- Aimed pericardial biopsies were obtained using specialized forceps, with standard or extensive sampling.
Main Results:
- Endoscopic visualization was superior with air instillation compared to saline.
- Pericardioscopy significantly improved the diagnostic value and sampling efficiency of pericardial biopsies compared to fluoroscopy-guided biopsy alone.
- Sampling efficiency was 86.2% (standard) and 87.3% (extensive) with pericardioscopy versus 43.7% with fluoroscopy alone.
- No major complications were observed; minor complications included transient ventricular tachycardia and pain at the sheath entry site.
Conclusions:
- Pericardioscopy, especially with air instillation, is a safe and technically feasible procedure for diagnosing pericardial diseases.
- The technique offers excellent visualization and extensive pericardial sampling, enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of biopsies.
- It represents a valuable advancement in the evaluation of pericardial effusions and diseases.
Related Concept Videos
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
