Related Experiment Videos
Gene therapy of cancer
1Department of Oncology, Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland. crochlitz@uhbs.ch
Abstract:
Gene therapy was initially thought of as a means to correct single gene defects in hereditary disease. In the meantime, cancer has become by far the most important indication for gene therapy in clinical trials. In the foreseeable future, the best way to achieve reasonable intratumoral concentrations of a transgene with available vectors is direct intratumoral injection with or without the aid of various techniques such as endoscopy or CT-guidance. At present, viral and non-viral methods of gene transfer are used either in vivo or ex vivo/in vitro. The most important viral vectors currently in use in clinical trials comprise retroviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, and herpes viruses. None of the available vectors satisfies all the criteria of an ideal gene therapeutic system, and vectors with only minimal residues of their parent viruses ("gutless vectors") as well as completely "synthetic viral vectors" will gain more and more importance in the future. Non-viral gene therapy methods include liposomes, injection of vector-free DNA ("naked DNA"), protein-DNA complexes, delivery by "gene gun," calcium-phosphate precipitation, electroporation, and intracellular microinjection of DNA. The first clinical trial of gene therapy for cancer was performed in 1991 in patients with melanoma, and since then more than 5000 patients have been treated worldwide in more than 400 clinical protocols. With the exception of a case of fatal toxicity in a young man with hereditary liver disease treated intrahepatically with high doses of adenovirus, side effects have been rare and usually mild in all these studies and expression of the transgene could be demonstrated in patients in vivo. However, despite anecdotal reports of therapeutic responses in some patients, unequivocal proof of clinical efficacy is still lacking for most of the varied approaches to gene therapy in humans. As well as our only fragmentary understanding of the molecular pathophysiology of many diseases, the principal reason for the present lack of clinical success of gene therapy is the very low transduction and expression efficiency in vivo of available vectors. Despite the complexities of gene therapy for cancer, the numerous different approaches can be subdivided into three basic concepts: (1) strengthening of the immune response against a tumour, (2) repair of cell cycle defects caused by losses of tumour suppressor genes or inappropriate activation of oncogenes, and (3) suicide gene strategies. In addition, the importance of gene marker studies and gene therapeutic protection of normal tissue are briefly covered in this review.
Insights
Gene therapy, initially for hereditary diseases, is now crucial for cancer treatment. While many clinical trials show rare side effects, achieving effective gene delivery and demonstrating clear clinical efficacy remain significant challenges.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Gene therapy's initial focus was hereditary diseases, but cancer has become its primary application in clinical trials.
- Direct intratumoral injection is currently the most effective method for achieving therapeutic transgene concentrations.
- Both viral and non-viral gene transfer methods are employed, with ongoing development of improved vectors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current landscape of gene therapy for cancer.
- To discuss the various viral and non-viral vectors used in clinical trials.
- To outline the main strategies and challenges in cancer gene therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of viral vectors (retroviruses, adenoviruses, adeno-associated viruses, herpes viruses) and non-viral methods (liposomes, naked DNA, etc.).
- Analysis of clinical trial data, including patient numbers, protocols, and reported side effects.
- Categorization of cancer gene therapy approaches into immune enhancement, cell cycle repair, and suicide gene strategies.
Main Results:
- Over 5000 patients have been treated in more than 400 clinical protocols since 1991.
- Side effects are generally rare and mild, with rare exceptions of severe toxicity.
- Demonstrated transgene expression in patients, but unequivocal clinical efficacy is still lacking for most approaches.
Conclusions:
- Despite progress, low in vivo transduction and expression efficiency are major hurdles for clinical success.
- Future advancements will likely involve "gutless" and synthetic viral vectors.
- Cancer gene therapy strategies primarily focus on immune stimulation, cell cycle correction, and suicide gene induction.