Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analysis of the reflexive feedback control loop during posture maintenance.

E de Vlugt1, F C van der Helm, A C Schouten

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. e.devlugt@wbmt.tudelft.nl

Biological Cybernetics
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Instrumented assessment of lower and upper motor neuron signs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using robotic manipulation: an explorative study.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2024
Same author

Closing the loop: Novel quantitative fMRI approach for manipulation of the sensorimotor loop in tremor.

NeuroImage·2022
Same author

Directionality of corticomuscular coupling in essential tremor and cortical myoclonic tremor.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2021
Same author

Estimating ankle torque and dynamics of the stabilizing mechanism: No need for horizontal ground reaction forces.

Journal of biomechanics·2020
Same author

Effect of Amplitude and Number of Repetitions of the Perturbation on System Identification of Human Balance Control During Stance.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2019
Same author

Assessment of the underlying systems involved in standing balance: the additional value of electromyography in system identification and parameter estimation.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2017
Same journal

Harmonic memory in phasor neural networks.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Correction: Decreased spinal inhibition leads to undiversified locomotor patterns.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Foundational issues of network models in biology.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Dynamical mechanisms for coordinating long-term working memory based on the precision of spike-timing in cortical neurons.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Distinct dopaminergic spike-timing-dependent plasticity rules are suited to different functional roles.

Biological cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Fluctuation-response relations for a two-stage population of spiking neurons stimulated by common noise.

Biological cybernetics·2026
See all related articles

This study models human arm reflexive control, finding that time delays limit reflex effectiveness. Optimal control strategies depend on disturbance frequency, explaining experimental observations in human arm posture experiments.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Neuroscience
  • Control Theory

Background:

  • Reflexive dynamics significantly influence human arm posture against stochastic forces.
  • Previous experiments showed reflex gains vary with disturbance frequency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze a simplified linear model of the reflexive feedback control loop.
  • To explain observed variations in reflex gains based on disturbance frequency.

Main Methods:

  • A linear model incorporating co-activation and reflexive feedback was developed.
  • A cost function representing 'minimize displacements' was mathematically defined and minimized.
  • A quasilinear approach was used for small-amplitude displacements.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reflexive feedback effectiveness is limited by time delays in the reflex loops.
  • Optimal solutions predict high reflex gains for low-frequency inputs (<5 Hz).
  • High input frequencies near the system's eigenfrequency (~5 Hz) lead to amplified, oscillatory behavior.

Conclusions:

  • Model predictions for reflex gains closely match experimental estimates.
  • The model explains negative reflex gains observed for sinusoidal inputs >1.5 Hz.
  • Boundary stability is optimal unless disturbance frequencies excite the system's eigenfrequency.