Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

M D Dunn1, E M McDougall, R V Clayman

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

Journal of Endourology
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Population dynamics of a South African isolate of <i>Steinernema yirgalemense in vitro</i> liquid culture, using egg yolk as protein source.

Journal of helminthology·2024
Same author

Laparoscopic renal surgery.

Minerva chirurgica·2009
Same author

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: review and assessment of an emerging technique.

Surgical endoscopy·2005
Same author

Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for radical nephrectomy?

Current urology reports·2002
Same author

Dual-organ ablative surgery using a hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. A report of four cases.

Surgical endoscopy·2002
Same author

Assessment of optimal balloon size for rupture of the ureteropelvic junction and mid-ureter in a porcine model.

Journal of endourology·2002
Same journal

Is Nonpapillary Puncture a Feasible Alternative to Papillary Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Procedure, Safety, and Outcomes of Patient-Controlled Sedation in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A 7-Year Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Benign Hyperplasia: A Preoperative Nomogram and a Postoperative Surveillance Protocol.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Bubble Trouble: The Thermal Risk of Ureteral Laser Lithotripsy in an Air Bubble.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Development of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2 Complications after Unilateral Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in UPJO: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Appendiceal Onlay Ureteroplasty and Appendiceal Interposition Ureteroplasty for Complex Proximal Ureteral Strictures in Children: Insights Gained from Long-Term Follow-Up.

Journal of endourology·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy offers comparable survival rates to open surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma. This minimally invasive approach significantly reduces recovery time and may allow earlier cancer treatment initiation.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Open nephrectomy is the standard for localized renal cell carcinoma.
  • Significant postoperative pain and extended recovery are drawbacks of open surgery.
  • Laparoscopic nephrectomy presents a viable alternative with comparable survival outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and benefits of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy compared to open surgery.
  • To highlight the advantages of minimally invasive techniques in renal cell carcinoma treatment.

Main Methods:

  • Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, utilizing transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approaches.
  • Adherence to oncologic principles including in situ dissection and early vessel ligation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Use of specialized instruments like PEER retractors and Endoholders.

    • Main Results:

    • Laparoscopic nephrectomy demonstrates similar 2- to 5-year survival rates to open surgery.
    • Patients experience an average recovery period 4.5 weeks shorter than with open surgery.
    • Potential benefits include earlier initiation of interleukin-2 therapy for metastatic disease patients.

    Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is an effective treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma.
    • The technique offers significant advantages in patient recovery and potential for earlier adjuvant therapy.
    • Ongoing advancements in technique and instrumentation are improving cost-effectiveness.