Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Imaging In-Stent Restenosis: An Inexpensive, Reliable, and Rapid Preclinical Model
Published on: September 14, 2009
Acute and subacute stent occlusion; risk-reduction by ionic contrast media
1Division of Internal Medicine III , University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Insights
Ionic contrast media, like Ioxaglate, significantly reduced stent thrombosis and adverse clinical events compared to non-ionic media in cardiology interventions. This finding supports Ioxaglate use when coronary stent placement is anticipated.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Controversial data exists on contrast media's impact on thrombotic complications in interventional cardiology.
- The effect of ionic contrast media on acute and subacute stent thrombosis remains under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of ionic versus non-ionic contrast media on stent thrombosis.
- To compare the incidence of acute and subacute stent occlusion between different contrast media types.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 3,990 patients undergoing coronary stent placement.
- Group I (1808 patients) received non-ionic contrast media; Group II (2182 patients) received ionic Ioxaglate.
- All patients received aspirin and ticlopidine for 4 weeks post-intervention.
Main Results:
- Acute stent occlusion was higher with non-ionic media (1.3%) versus ionic Ioxaglate (0.3%), P=0.001.
- Subacute stent occlusion was also higher with non-ionic media (2.4%) versus ionic Ioxaglate (0.7%), P=0.001.
- Ioxaglate use significantly reduced the combined endpoint of CABG, TLR, and mortality within 12 months (16.3% vs 22.9%, P=0.001).
Conclusions:
- The use of ionic contrast media, specifically Ioxaglate, is associated with lower rates of stent thrombosis.
- Ioxaglate demonstrates a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events post-intervention.
- Recommend Ioxaglate for coronary interventions involving anticipated stent placement.
Aims:
Current data concerning the influence of X-ray contrast media on the incidence of thrombotic complications in interventional cardiology are controversial. The effect of ionic contrast media on acute (< or =72 h) and subacute (< or =30 days) stent thrombosis has not been investigated.
Methods:
Three thousand, nine hundred and ninety consecutive patients underwent coronary stent placement. Group I (n=1808) received non-ionic contrast media while group II (n=2182) was given the ionic Ioxaglate. All patients were treated with a standard regimen of aspirin and ticlopidine for 4 weeks post intervention.
Results:
Both acute and subacute stent occlusion occurred more frequently in patients receiving non-ionic contrast media compared to ionic contrast media (acute stent occlusion: 1.3% in group I vs 0.3% in group II, P=0.001; subacute stent occlusion: 2.4% in group I vs 0.7% in group II, P=0.001). The incidence of the combined clinical end-point of coronary artery bypass grafting, target lesion revascularization, and overall mortality within 12 months was significantly reduced by the use of Ioxaglate (22.9% vs 16.3%, P=0.001).
Conclusions:
Based upon these data, we recommend the use of Ioxaglate in coronary interventions when stent placement is anticipated.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

