Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Gender differences in lifting technique.

L Lindbeck1, K Kjellberg

  • 1The National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden. Lars.Lindbeck@niwl.se

Ergonomics
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the effects of intra-granule precipitation in a full-scale industrial anaerobic digester.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2019
Same author

Evaluation of anaerobic digestion post-treatment options using an integrated model-based approach.

Water research·2019
Same author

Modelling an industrial anaerobic granular reactor using a multi-scale approach.

Water research·2017
Same author

The Association Between Self-Assessed Future Work Ability and Long-Term Sickness Absence, Disability Pension and Unemployment in a General Working Population: A 7-Year Follow-Up Study.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2015
Same author

Effect assessment in work environment interventions: a methodological reflection.

Ergonomics·2010
Same author

Ergonomics evaluation of Picture Archiving and Communication System implementations in two X-ray departments.

Ergonomics·2007
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Gender differences in lifting techniques are under-explored. This study found distinct motion patterns between men and women during squat and stoop lifts, suggesting separate evaluations for manual handling tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Ergonomics and Biomechanics
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Limited research exists on gender-specific motion patterns in work technique assessment.
  • Understanding gender differences in manual handling is crucial for effective workplace design and injury prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential gender differences in lifting techniques.
  • To analyze kinematic data during squat and stoop lifts in male and female participants.

Main Methods:

  • Opto-electronic measurement systems were used to capture movement data.
  • 12 female and 10 male participants performed squat and stoop lifting tasks.
  • Kinematic data, including trunk motion and joint coordination, were analyzed.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Significant differences were observed in trunk motion and knee angle ranges between genders.
  • Women exhibited more synchronized hip-knee interjoint coordination compared to men.
  • Relative phase angle analysis highlighted gender-specific coordination patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Gender-specific motion patterns in manual handling require further exploration.
  • Separate evaluation of work techniques for men and women is recommended.
  • Investigating the benefits of different coordination patterns is necessary for optimizing lifting strategies.